From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECdhj-0003Sg-H4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:41:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86Da99K031703; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:36:09 GMT Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86DTDwR029602 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:29:13 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1ECdYv-0003wh-Ca for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:32:33 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECA014001A3 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:32:32 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:32:28 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Windows on a second drive? Message-ID: <20050906143228.201a5601@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20050906122236.1608dec6@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14 (GTK+ 2.6.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_14_32_28_+0100_u4e82lCAjvwIaRYg; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 68e3d8d7-0d2e-46e9-9fce-3e2d3761a46b X-Archives-Hash: 6cdb7ab669807abd077a6deca99709db --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_14_32_28_+0100_u4e82lCAjvwIaRYg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:12:33 +0100, Michael Kintzios wrote: > You're right, at least as far as preparing the installation of WinXP > goes. After it gets installed I would rejumper it to a slave and put > the Gentoo drive as a master, assuming of course that Gentoo is the OS > used more often and its speed counts more than that of WinXP. Is there a speed difference between master and slave? --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 8: Tight slacks --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_14_32_28_+0100_u4e82lCAjvwIaRYg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHZpvum4al0N1GQMRAslOAJ9qb++SRfHptHwyyPHyg+ahMNPLuACgsyfh 8lYtX8mA+AZs/9LwdaUEaQ4= =syjq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__6_Sep_2005_14_32_28_+0100_u4e82lCAjvwIaRYg-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list