From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECOpS-0003TK-Ay for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:48:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85LiM17022576; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:44:22 GMT Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85Leh5t002691 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:40:43 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ECOku-0007vl-Cl for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:43:56 +0000 Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA041410445 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:43:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:48:59 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited Message-ID: <20050905224859.06ea7231@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <431CA7CB.70709@gmail.com> References: <001f01c5b233$a27526b0$0501a8c0@croatus> <431CA7CB.70709@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14 (GTK+ 2.6.10; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_48_59_+0100_x5mIRP/gKgOK7ign"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 00a2fbbc-268e-4696-b605-97c84d9afc58 X-Archives-Hash: cb0282dd72afc5d147c2e2c2bbe81048 --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_48_59_+0100_x5mIRP/gKgOK7ign Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:17:15 +0200, q-parser wrote: > I don't see much into this, but will it not be in confict if you use > the same IP and port for 2 ServerNames? No, this is how name based virtual hosting works. The browser sends a host: header with the request, Apache uses this to determine which virtual host to use to serve the content. It is possible to serve thousands of hosts from a single port and IP address. See the commented vhost config files and the documentation for a more complete explanation. > I would use different ports for=20 > these two webs instead. That would require visitors to type a port number as well as the URI, something most web users are not accustomed to. --=20 Neil Bothwick Are you using Windows or is that just an XT? --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_48_59_+0100_x5mIRP/gKgOK7ign Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHL1Uum4al0N1GQMRAv0AAKDEJ7MUz1v5gWxB0t8hNR22dkCYeQCffXW2 hssItZu1WRbsnWcxdtlme/s= =E+Nj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__5_Sep_2005_22_48_59_+0100_x5mIRP/gKgOK7ign-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list