From: Robert Crawford <flacycads@cox.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /dev/cdrom has gone!
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:17:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509051317.30065.flacycads@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509051551.34331.stevee@gorbag.com>
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:51 am, Steve Evans wrote:
> On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
> > I just had a similar problem after I updated udev (I think). I run ~x86
> > systems, always kept current, so I expect a few minor hiccups, even
> > though I'm extremely careful with etc-update. There seems to be some
> > weird stuff going on with udev, at least on my system, but after a lot of
> > reading on the formum, and trying many things, I tried changing my fstab
> > line
> >
> > /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,rw,user 0 0
> >
> > to this.
> >
> > /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,rw,user 0 0
> >
> > I think some rule in the new udev changed, and it wasn't creating cdroms
> > and cdrom0 anymore- only /dev/hdc.
> >
> > I looked in /dev, and sure enough, the cdrom and cdrw links point to the
> > hdc block device.
> >
> > Anyway, whatever it was, changing the fstab line now lets me mount cdroms
> > normally, as before.
> >
> > Robert Crawford
>
> I assume that as you are running ~x86 you have upgraded to gentoo-sources
> version 2.6.13. In that version devfs has been removed (well the config
> option has gone, the code is still there). The /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 style of
> device file name is a part of devfs, so if with earlier kernels you still
> had devfs enabled in the kernel, despite running udev, then you would have
> gotten the /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 link.
>
> I am running x86 and running with udev but with devfs still in the kernel.
> Yesterday I disabled devfs on one of the machines so that I could see what
> would break in preparation for 2.6.13 moving to x86. I experienced exactly
> your problem of /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 disappearing. Fortunately the solution
> is simple, as you describe above.
>
> Steve
> --
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Steve Evans E-mail: mailto:stevee@gorbag.com
> WEB: http://www.gorbag.com
> Registered Linux user #217906: http://counter.li.org
> Public Encryption Key: http://www.gorbag.com/public-key.html
> ____________________________________________________________________
Steve,
What you say makes perfect sense, but I'm still not sure I have an
understanding of what has changed. I always compile my own kernels from
vanilla, and patches, so I haven't used gentoo-sources in at least 2 years.
My current kernel is 2.6.13-gvivid (based on 2.6.13 final), which works
great, and is where I first noticed this cdrom problem. I did notice that
devfs had finally been removed.
However, when I boot with other previous kernels (2.6.12.x- vivid and nitro,
and 2.6.12.3 vanilla), the problem remains. This leads me to believe that
somehow it's the newest udev version causing and some kind of compatibility
issue with recent kernels. I haven't investigated this much, but it didn't
happen with the previous udev version.
Anyway, for now I'm content with the fstab hdc edit resolution, and happy to
be rid of devfs..
Robert
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-05 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-03 10:19 [gentoo-user] /dev/cdrom has gone! danielhf
2005-09-03 10:36 ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-03 12:08 ` danielhf
2005-09-03 12:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2005-09-03 12:07 ` Sven Köhler
2005-09-03 12:32 ` danielhf
2005-09-03 12:40 ` danielhf
2005-09-03 12:53 ` Alex Korshunov
2005-09-03 13:20 ` Matt Randolph
2005-09-03 13:31 ` danielhf
2005-09-04 13:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Greg Yasko
2005-09-03 13:40 ` [gentoo-user] " John Jolet
2005-09-03 13:56 ` danielhf
2005-09-03 13:28 ` danielhf
2005-09-03 14:53 ` Philip Webb
2005-09-03 17:45 ` Daniel Drake
2005-09-04 3:06 ` danielhf
2005-09-04 5:21 ` danielhf
2005-09-04 13:13 ` Sven Köhler
2005-09-03 18:35 ` Greg Yasko
2005-09-05 13:56 ` danielhf
2005-09-05 14:31 ` Robert Crawford
2005-09-05 14:51 ` Steve Evans
2005-09-05 17:17 ` Robert Crawford [this message]
2005-09-05 17:55 ` Robert Crawford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509051317.30065.flacycads@cox.net \
--to=flacycads@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox