Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 08:49 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy: > Comments inline: > > moriah ~ # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > udev 252M 2.6M 249M 2% /dev Hmm, mine takes 116k, how comes your /dev uses 2.6M? > cachedir 3.8G 2.2G 1.6G 59% /lib/splash/cache This looks to be the same as /, what is it good for, could you explain this? > /dev/vg1/usr 32G 5.9G 27G 19% /usr > /dev/vg1/var 48G 2.3G 46G 5% /var I doubt you'll ever get them filled. > /dev/vg1/tmp 16G 33M 16G 1% /tmp I use tmpfs for this, but that really depends. > /dev/vg1/home 77G 26G 52G 34% /home As said before I prefer per-user volumes (and use the automounter to mount them on demand). > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 07:49 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 06:28 schrieb ext Mark Knecht: > > > That's very helpful. To test my understanding > > > > > > /dev/hda1 - boot - 100M > > > > Way too much. > > only if you are using for nothing else but kernels - as mentioned in my > prev. I intended using it for storage as well as booting. > > > > /dev/hda2 - swap - 2G > > > > Can be on a logical volume, too. > > I have seen warnings against doing this due to poor performance Do you have any real numbers? > > > /dev/hda3 - NOT CLEAR - the backup/rescue install? > > > > Why? Use the LiveCD. > > Some machines dont have a CD. A liveCD also doesnt run squid with my > setup, a mailfiltering gateway or my particular firewall configuration > and so on so its either useless, or means extensive downtime to > reconfigure. For pure rescue, or a limited desktop a liveCD is fine > (and generally knoppix is superior anyway for a desktop) > only if you are using for nothing else but kernels - as mentioned in my > prev. I intended using it for storage as well as booting. OK, depending on the use of the machine, it may be useful, but Mark didn't tell. So I wanted to show another way. > > > /dev/hda5 - root - 4G > > > > Can also be on a logical volume, but needs an initrd/initramfs. 4G is > > too large, IMHO. Mine is 256M. > > As you can see, I already use 2.2G of the root (and 2.9G on another > system), and sometimes much more - so 256M isnt going to get me far! I wonder what else to put on / that couldn't be on a separate volume? / has everything to get things set up, nothing more nothing less. If I'd need a rescue system, I would rsync my current / to a separate volume/partition and change one line in /etc/fstab on the clone and add an entry for it to grub conf. > Set it to your own particular requirements. I dont use initrd's - too > flakey, extra work thats not needed in most cases. I decided in my > early experiments to limit LVM for data on the partitions that cause me > grief with space so most of the root partitions including /etc and /lib > are on a base filesystem (/) This can simplify working on the system. > It is possible to use LVM for nearly everything, but there's extra > complexity, and warnings about some configurations. > > Small roots used to be the way in the old days, but the number of > machines that crashed due to running out of root space were legion! As you can see below, even my 256M are too much, only 52% are used and it didn't change much for years. Even if I would run out of space on /, I could simply grow it (and since it's a lv, with reiserfs on it, it can be done online). > > Sizes: > > # df -h|grep evms > > /dev/evms/root 256M 132M 125M 52% / Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@capgemini.com Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net