From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E9AtD-0007FP-B2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:19:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7S0GdIW025948; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:16:39 GMT Received: from nexon.borjesson.homedns.org (h103n7c1o1031.bredband.skanova.com [62.20.240.103]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7S0D2tH013965 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:13:02 GMT Received: by nexon.borjesson.homedns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84C8067CE1; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:14:41 +0200 From: Patrick =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6rjesson?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bbgallery and template files Message-ID: <20050828001440.GA9477@nexon> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <87k6ia0wyh.fsf@newsguy.com> <200508271247.52309.mike@gaima.co.uk> <87u0hbio30.fsf@newsguy.com> <200508271351.02072.mike@gaima.co.uk> <87mzn3uf61.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mzn3uf61.fsf@newsguy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 0dc25477-f617-4f2b-95ba-54e5bbe85cff X-Archives-Hash: 0a0af776fa2e2259ceb32bed7ffe4edd --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/08/27 18:35, Harry Putnam wrote: > Mike Williams writes: > > Getting it done this morning is another matter, going several months > > without an update is likely to put you a long way back, meaning lots > > to compile. Thankfully you can just leave it going in the > > background. I almost always run >=20 > This appears now to have been a rather hefty understatement. I'm not > sure what time this morning I started on this but its now 6:34 where > I am and its still running strong. >=20 > This seems a bit long.... Is this a normal amount of time for an > update world to run (something like ten hours so far)? Definitely if you've kept off an update for more than a month! Things like OpenOffice, KDE, glibc, and all the other behemoths take "a while" (li= ke up to a couple of hours, depending on CPU) to compile each. So 10 hours is definitely not something to worry about.=20 --=20 Regards, Patrick B=F6rjesson PGP signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x2179= 2A5D PGP fingerprint: 74AF D4EF 6BDE CF77 16BE 6A29 CDB8 7607 2179 2A5D --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDEQHwzbh2ByF5Kl0RApm6AKDJ8NtV8PAN6lwARKN4bTSfu1X18wCff5Ht w5uzLS1D3d+86kT+q7ld9FY= =NbiH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list