From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8x23-0000BU-9R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:31:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7R9Sw1i010390; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:28:58 GMT Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7R9NKNu024203 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:23:20 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1E8wvl-0007H4-94 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:24:53 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C516B140022A for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:24:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:24:50 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bbgallery and template files Message-ID: <20050827102450.35030ab6@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <87ek8gjjbw.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87k6ia0wyh.fsf@newsguy.com> <430DFE99.5000104@planet.nl> <430E27B2.8060400@cisco.com> <87u0hdggia.fsf@newsguy.com> <430F86DA.4030602@cisco.com> <873bowgryy.fsf@newsguy.com> <87ek8gjjbw.fsf@newsguy.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14-rc1 (GTK+ 2.6.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Sat__27_Aug_2005_10_24_50_+0100_3TX=07KB1p16F41v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: d8adb4f7-0cf6-4ae0-9cef-5ec2464940c1 X-Archives-Hash: 097638215b62b6790f2d8144bbbd5679 --Signature_Sat__27_Aug_2005_10_24_50_+0100_3TX=07KB1p16F41v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:48:35 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > I've downloaded todays snapshot of protage and extracted > gimp-perl. Placed it in my portage tree. Then unmasked it with > package.keyword file and ran `emerge -v -p gimp-perl and then without > -p. >=20 > The build pulled in 20 other perl packages and is running currently. > Should I expect trouble from doing it this way? Yes, if the dependencies are not in your outdated portage tree, although it appears you got away with it this time. Why don't you want an up to date portage tree? --=20 Neil Bothwick "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult" -C.A.R. Hoare --Signature_Sat__27_Aug_2005_10_24_50_+0100_3TX=07KB1p16F41v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDEDFium4al0N1GQMRAlaCAJ0c8WGpZHxuwQpRjsXzqhspFkLgAwCgmVyF ZZBacRZ26t68e6sFEZ3Q1ug= =glUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sat__27_Aug_2005_10_24_50_+0100_3TX=07KB1p16F41v-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list