* [gentoo-user] VMWare? @ 2005-08-21 3:01 Ian K 2005-08-21 3:04 ` John Jolet 2005-08-21 3:37 ` Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ian K @ 2005-08-21 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo list Hey all, I have a friend who is getting a desktop, (high end) and was wondering if he should VMware under WinXp and install Gentoo on VMWare. How slow would this be if any, under an Athlon 64 3000+, and what are general pros and cons with VMware? He is also thinking of dualbooting, would that be smarter? Thanks! Ian __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:01 [gentoo-user] VMWare? Ian K @ 2005-08-21 3:04 ` John Jolet 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales 2005-08-21 3:37 ` Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: John Jolet @ 2005-08-21 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user that's backwards! install vmware under gentoo, then win xp under vmware. On Saturday 20 August 2005 22:01, Ian K wrote: > Hey all, > I have a friend who is getting a desktop, (high end) > and was wondering if he should VMware under WinXp and > install Gentoo on VMWare. How slow would this be if > any, under an Athlon 64 3000+, and what are general > pros and cons with VMware? He is also thinking of > dualbooting, would that be smarter? > Thanks! > Ian > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com -- John Jolet Your On-Demand IT Department 512-762-0729 www.jolet.net john@jolet.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:04 ` John Jolet @ 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales 2005-08-21 4:09 ` Michael Crute ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales @ 2005-08-21 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do much damage. As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. I never tested it, but I hear it is a great emulator. Plex86, the free software counter-part, is still under development. So it is really young and probably has less funcionalities. I don't know any other options. If he really wants a Unix-like enviroment running on Windows, I think it will be easier to install CygWin.. 2005/8/21, John Jolet <john@jolet.net>: > that's backwards! install vmware under gentoo, then win xp under vmware. > > On Saturday 20 August 2005 22:01, Ian K wrote: > > Hey all, > > I have a friend who is getting a desktop, (high end) > > and was wondering if he should VMware under WinXp and > > install Gentoo on VMWare. How slow would this be if > > any, under an Athlon 64 3000+, and what are general > > pros and cons with VMware? He is also thinking of > > dualbooting, would that be smarter? > > Thanks! > > Ian > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > John Jolet > Your On-Demand IT Department > 512-762-0729 > www.jolet.net > john@jolet.net > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales @ 2005-08-21 4:09 ` Michael Crute 2005-08-21 4:28 ` Marco Matthies 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick 2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Michael Crute @ 2005-08-21 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2596 bytes --] I personally run it the "right way" if there is such a thing. Gentoo with VMware 5 installed on the computer and XP Pro installed inside of VMware. For what little I need Windoze VMware works wonders. It runs most Windows apps (including the OS) almost faster than it runs naively. I haven't tried it the other way around (VMware installed on top of Windoze) but I can imagine that it runs far slower on Windoze than it does on Gentoo. As far as my experience running VMware on Gentoo I have nothing but good experiences. The only downside is the licensing cost to get a copy of VMware. -Mike On 8/20/05, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales <raphael.melo21@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and > run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do > much damage. > > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. I > never tested it, but I hear it is a great emulator. Plex86, the free > software counter-part, is still under development. So it is really > young and probably has less funcionalities. I don't know any other > options. > > If he really wants a Unix-like enviroment running on Windows, I think > it will be easier to install CygWin.. > > 2005/8/21, John Jolet <john@jolet.net>: > > that's backwards! install vmware under gentoo, then win xp under vmware. > > > > On Saturday 20 August 2005 22:01, Ian K wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > I have a friend who is getting a desktop, (high end) > > > and was wondering if he should VMware under WinXp and > > > install Gentoo on VMWare. How slow would this be if > > > any, under an Athlon 64 3000+, and what are general > > > pros and cons with VMware? He is also thinking of > > > dualbooting, would that be smarter? > > > Thanks! > > > Ian > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > John Jolet > > Your On-Demand IT Department > > 512-762-0729 > > www.jolet.net <http://www.jolet.net> > > john@jolet.net > > -- > > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- ________________________________ Michael E. Crute Software Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware. "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3296 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales 2005-08-21 4:09 ` Michael Crute @ 2005-08-21 4:28 ` Marco Matthies 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick 2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Marco Matthies @ 2005-08-21 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales wrote: > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. I > never tested it, but I hear it is a great emulator. Plex86, the free > software counter-part, is still under development. So it is really > young and probably has less funcionalities. I don't know any other > options. You may also want to try qemu (LGPL) and the acceleration kernel module kqemu, which makes qemu quite competetive with vmware (but is sadly not open-source). http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/ Plex86 apparently can only run a patched linux guest os at the moment: http://plex86.sourceforge.net/ http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7762667&forum_id=26580 Marco -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales 2005-08-21 4:09 ` Michael Crute 2005-08-21 4:28 ` Marco Matthies @ 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick 2005-08-21 13:06 ` Sandy McGuffog 2005-08-22 6:21 ` Richard Fish 2 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Neil Bothwick @ 2005-08-21 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 933 bytes --] On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:46:20 -0300, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales wrote: > I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and > run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do > much damage. That's how I do it and it works well. I very rarely use VMWare for Windows, mainly for testing on different Linux distros. It runs virtually as fast as native hardware, apart from a slight reduction in disk speed from the virtual disks. VMWare 5 is very nice, and runs much better on amd64 than the 4.x series. > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. That's hardly an issue if he's going to run Windows with it :-O -- Neil Bothwick A friend of mine sent me a postcard with a satellite photo of the entire planet on it, and on the back he wrote, "Wish you were here." [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick @ 2005-08-21 13:06 ` Sandy McGuffog 2005-08-21 14:43 ` Greg Shikhman 2005-08-22 6:21 ` Richard Fish 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Sandy McGuffog @ 2005-08-21 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user I too run VMWare 5 on XP (as well as a dual boot installation) and can confirm it runs at near native speeds. Be aware however that there is an issue with the clock on 2.4 series kernels - due to the changes made to run at 1000Hz, you will find that Gentoo's clock no longer keeps perfect time. This problem can be improved, but not completely solved, by (a) recompiling the kernel to run at a lower clock and (b) running the VMWare toolkit, which has a clock "helper" On 8/21/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:46:20 -0300, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales > wrote: > > > I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and > > run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do > > much damage. > > That's how I do it and it works well. I very rarely use VMWare for > Windows, mainly for testing on different Linux distros. It runs virtually > as fast as native hardware, apart from a slight reduction in disk speed > from the virtual disks. > > VMWare 5 is very nice, and runs much better on amd64 than the 4.x series. > > > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. > > That's hardly an issue if he's going to run Windows with it :-O > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > A friend of mine sent me a postcard with a satellite photo of the > entire planet on it, and on the back he wrote, "Wish you were here." > > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 13:06 ` Sandy McGuffog @ 2005-08-21 14:43 ` Greg Shikhman 2005-08-21 19:42 ` Michael Crute 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Greg Shikhman @ 2005-08-21 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1910 bytes --] The only issue with running WinXP inside a virtual environment is it becomes useless for gaming (making windows COMPLETELY useless) because VMWare doesn't have support for DirectX. On 8/21/05, Sandy McGuffog <mcguffogl@gmail.com> wrote: > > I too run VMWare 5 on XP (as well as a dual boot installation) and can > confirm it runs at near native speeds. > > Be aware however that there is an issue with the clock on 2.4 series > kernels - due to the changes made to run at 1000Hz, you will find that > Gentoo's clock no longer keeps perfect time. This problem can be > improved, but not completely solved, by (a) recompiling the kernel to > run at a lower clock and (b) running the VMWare toolkit, which has a > clock "helper" > > On 8/21/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:46:20 -0300, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos > Sales > > wrote: > > > > > I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and > > > run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do > > > much damage. > > > > That's how I do it and it works well. I very rarely use VMWare for > > Windows, mainly for testing on different Linux distros. It runs > virtually > > as fast as native hardware, apart from a slight reduction in disk speed > > from the virtual disks. > > > > VMWare 5 is very nice, and runs much better on amd64 than the 4.xseries. > > > > > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > > > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. > > > > That's hardly an issue if he's going to run Windows with it :-O > > > > > > -- > > Neil Bothwick > > > > A friend of mine sent me a postcard with a satellite photo of the > > entire planet on it, and on the back he wrote, "Wish you were here." > > > > > > > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2378 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 14:43 ` Greg Shikhman @ 2005-08-21 19:42 ` Michael Crute 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Michael Crute @ 2005-08-21 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2381 bytes --] Well you can still run Photoshop. :-D -Mike On 8/21/05, Greg Shikhman <cornmander@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only issue with running WinXP inside a virtual environment is it > becomes useless for gaming (making windows COMPLETELY useless) because > VMWare doesn't have support for DirectX. > > On 8/21/05, Sandy McGuffog <mcguffogl@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I too run VMWare 5 on XP (as well as a dual boot installation) and can > > confirm it runs at near native speeds. > > > > Be aware however that there is an issue with the clock on 2.4 series > > kernels - due to the changes made to run at 1000Hz, you will find that > > Gentoo's clock no longer keeps perfect time. This problem can be > > improved, but not completely solved, by (a) recompiling the kernel to > > run at a lower clock and (b) running the VMWare toolkit, which has a > > clock "helper" > > > > On 8/21/05, Neil Bothwick < neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:46:20 -0300, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos > > Sales > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and > > > > run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do > > > > much damage. > > > > > > That's how I do it and it works well. I very rarely use VMWare for > > > Windows, mainly for testing on different Linux distros. It runs > > virtually > > > as fast as native hardware, apart from a slight reduction in disk > > speed > > > from the virtual disks. > > > > > > VMWare 5 is very nice, and runs much better on amd64 than the 4.xseries. > > > > > > > As for comments on VMWare, it isn't free software and you need a > > > > licence key. Some purists don't like the fact that it isn't free. > > > > > > That's hardly an issue if he's going to run Windows with it :-O > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Neil Bothwick > > > > > > A friend of mine sent me a postcard with a satellite photo of the > > > entire planet on it, and on the back he wrote, "Wish you were here." > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > -- ________________________________ Michael E. Crute Software Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware. "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3353 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick 2005-08-21 13:06 ` Sandy McGuffog @ 2005-08-22 6:21 ` Richard Fish 2005-08-24 6:10 ` Daevid Vincent 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Richard Fish @ 2005-08-22 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:46:20 -0300, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales >wrote: > > > >>I agree with John. It is better to have a robust system (Gentoo) and >>run the bad one (Windows) on user space (via VMWare) so it can't do >>much damage. >> >> > >That's how I do it and it works well. I very rarely use VMWare for >Windows, mainly for testing on different Linux distros. It runs virtually >as fast as native hardware, apart from a slight reduction in disk speed >from the virtual disks. > >VMWare 5 is very nice, and runs much better on amd64 than the 4.x series. > > > I've done this both ways with Workstation 4.5. Using Windows as the host OS is a good choice if you want every single piece of hardware to "just work". I never had a problem with speed (only with the clock, as someone else mentioned), except for compiling. The virtual machine memory bandwidth seems to be significantly reduced compared to native, by maybe as much as 50%, which made compiling take quite a bit longer. Maybe this is improved in WS5, although I can't really say, because now I run the "right way" (TM). One possibility is to setup the system as a dual-boot system, and give yourself the choice of running Gentoo from within VMWare or natively. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-22 6:21 ` Richard Fish @ 2005-08-24 6:10 ` Daevid Vincent 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Daevid Vincent @ 2005-08-24 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user This is exactly what I do. I run VMWare on XP and I just use the raw partition for gentoo. The beauty is that when I really need to be native in gentoo for some reason (maybe for kismet or something hardware related), I just dual-boot into it. It's very slick. And it's pretty f'n awesome to be able to run BOTH OSs at the SAME TIME. D.Vin > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Fish [mailto:bigfish@asmallpond.org] > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 11:21 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? > > > One possibility is to setup the system as a dual-boot system, > and give > yourself the choice of running Gentoo from within VMWare or natively. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare? 2005-08-21 3:01 [gentoo-user] VMWare? Ian K 2005-08-21 3:04 ` John Jolet @ 2005-08-21 3:37 ` Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC @ 2005-08-21 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Aug 20, 2005, at 9:01 PM, Ian K wrote: > Hey all, > I have a friend who is getting a desktop, (high end) > and was wondering if he should VMware under WinXp and > install Gentoo on VMWare. How slow would this be if > any, under an Athlon 64 3000+, He should install gentoo and then install XP pro in that instead. Probably more stable :-) > and what are general > pros and cons with VMware? He is also thinking of > dualbooting, would that be smarter? Does he need access to both at the same time? Then run with VMWare. If not, then use dual booting Chad > Thanks! > Ian > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-24 6:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-08-21 3:01 [gentoo-user] VMWare? Ian K 2005-08-21 3:04 ` John Jolet 2005-08-21 3:46 ` Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales 2005-08-21 4:09 ` Michael Crute 2005-08-21 4:28 ` Marco Matthies 2005-08-21 7:39 ` Neil Bothwick 2005-08-21 13:06 ` Sandy McGuffog 2005-08-21 14:43 ` Greg Shikhman 2005-08-21 19:42 ` Michael Crute 2005-08-22 6:21 ` Richard Fish 2005-08-24 6:10 ` Daevid Vincent 2005-08-21 3:37 ` Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox