From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7bnY-0004bc-9t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:38:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7NGaZap028195; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:36:35 GMT Received: from smtp2.delfi.lv (smtp2.delfi.lv [195.2.96.244]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7NGSk4E001825 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:28:46 GMT Received: from [62.85.19.80] ([62.85.19.80]) by smtp2.delfi.lv (8.13.3/8.13.3/8.8.0) with ESMTP id j7NGTdKw049238 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:29:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mar@ml.lv) From: Martins Steinbergs Organization: - To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] shared memory Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:29:41 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200508231746.06551.mar@ml.lv> <430B5FAA.1020805@sdf-eu.org> In-Reply-To: <430B5FAA.1020805@sdf-eu.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508231929.41784.mar@ml.lv> X-Spam-Score: 0.6 () J_CHICKENPOX_62 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 195.2.96.244 X-Archives-Salt: 62677ed1-bd58-4e8f-8e73-cad037d79c8f X-Archives-Hash: 33f8c0b003c6b2bcaaa69e3924504717 defaults was there for ages and it worked until recent. I'm not sure is it good idea, but changed it to users and got things working. will add noexec, rw as you sudgest. thanx Martins On Tuesday 23 August 2005 20:40, Jonas Geiregat wrote: > Martins Steinbergs wrote: > >fstab has entry: > >none /dev/shm defaults 0 0 > > First and for all change defaults to noexec,rw , why would you want > anyone to be able to execute anything in a volatile fs ? > Second /dev/shm is `as far as I know` only added to be compatible with > glibc2.2 and above so the POSIX shm_open and shm_unlink can be used, try > running > touch /dev/shm/foo > if this works then nothing is wrong with /dev/shm or any related > settings , I think .. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list