From: Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [completely OT]Re: [gentoo-user] weird 1000baseT problem
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:06:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508121306.38274.uwix@iway.na> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42FC869B.2080501@net-1.org>
On 12 August 2005 12:23, Mark Humphrey wrote:
> Uwe Thiem wrote:
> >On 12 August 2005 04:13, Bob Sanders wrote:
> >>On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:40:12 +0100
> >>
> >>Uwe Thiem <uwix@iway.na> wrote:
> >>>I am puzzled. First I thought that the Gb NIC on box A is somehow kaput
> >>>but case 1 surely shows it is performing. What the heck is going on
> >>> here? I would be deeply indebted to any person on this list that could
> >>> shed some light on this. Any hint what to investigate would be highly
> >>> appreciated. Really. This has troubled me for the last three days and I
> >>> would go as far as ship you a Windhoek Lager. ;-)
>
> It would probably cost 10 times the price of the lager for shipping.
> Maybe you should make it a case? I heard that Namibia Breweries is due
> to stop making Heineken and it's going to SAB? :-)
Sure shipping would cost more than the lager. But what the heck!
No way Namibia Breweries is going to SAB!!!! SAB might be the second largest
brewery in the world but they still make junk beer. Even Pilsner Urquell has
become less good since SAB bought them.
As for Heineken, I don't know whether they are going to stop making it, and I
don't care. It isn't really good beer. BTW, there is a funny little story
about it. When Namibia Breweries started to make Heineken, it turned out
better than the original. So the good boys from Heineken got their collective
butts over to Namibia to study the brewing process here. Afterwards, they
changed their brewing back home according to what they learnt here. :-)
Uwe
--
95% of all programmers rate themselves among the top 5% of all software
developers. - Linus Torvalds
http://www.uwix.iway.na (last updated: 20.06.2004)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 19:40 [gentoo-user] weird 1000baseT problem Uwe Thiem
2005-08-12 1:40 ` Ow Mun Heng
2005-08-12 2:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-08-12 7:58 ` Uwe Thiem
2005-08-12 3:13 ` Bob Sanders
2005-08-12 10:44 ` Uwe Thiem
2005-08-12 11:23 ` Mark Humphrey
2005-08-12 12:06 ` Uwe Thiem [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508121306.38274.uwix@iway.na \
--to=uwix@iway.na \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox