From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3XAR-0000cV-55 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:53:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7CApH7P012826; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:51:17 GMT Received: from smtp2.iway.na (smtp2.iway.na [196.44.136.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7CAjQ5q008143 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:45:26 GMT Received: from vscan.iway.na ([196.44.136.13]) by smtp2.iway.na (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id IL3XZV02.IU7 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:45:31 +0000 Received: from mx2.iway.na ([196.44.136.13]) by vscan.iway.na (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id IL3V9B01.MO7 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:46:23 +0100 Received: from uwix.alt.na ([196.44.132.131]) by mx2.iway.na (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id IL3V9B01.VIL for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:46:23 +0100 Received: from uwe by uwix.alt.na with local (Exim 4.50) id 1E3UR6-0003tM-1z for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:58:40 +0100 From: Uwe Thiem Organization: SysEx (Pty) Ltd. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] weird 1000baseT problem Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:58:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200508112040.12288.uwix@iway.na> <1123810848.18036.3.camel@neuromancer.home.net> In-Reply-To: <1123810848.18036.3.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508120858.39710.uwix@iway.na> Sender: Uwe Thiem X-Archives-Salt: c76ede8f-acab-4eeb-85f6-ebbe684c1f88 X-Archives-Hash: 549ec71489bf45e337a85afaf0770258 On 12 August 2005 02:40, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 20:40 +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote: > > Case 5: > > I log into B and sftp into A. It sits there for about 10 seconds before > > presenting me with a password prompt. ???? After, I get transfer rates > > close to case 2 and case 3, just the other way round. > > The issues with the slow logon is most likely due to some DNS lookups or > something. I've had this before, (can't remember what happened but > managed to fix it). > > I believe your SSH sessions will also be hung for 10 secs? Yup, the delay occurs with both ssh and sftp. Has nothing to do with DNS. It also occurs when using IP addresses. Uwe -- 95% of all programmers rate themselves among the top 5% of all software developers. - Linus Torvalds http://www.uwix.iway.na (last updated: 20.06.2004) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list