From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3Lrc-0002XD-BP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:49:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BMlVaY022186; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:47:31 GMT Received: from ranger.systems.pipex.net (ranger.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.32]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BMhn4n030044 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:43:49 GMT Received: from peter.ruskin (81-86-110-137.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.110.137]) by ranger.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFC2E0000EE for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:44:43 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Ruskin Organization: Retired To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam? Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:44:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <42FB99BA.1050208@mid.email-server.info> In-Reply-To: <42FB99BA.1050208@mid.email-server.info> X-Face: #0~Nu=!B]El3-Ch@z'~'##Obk:cSY58&3DX4ogDDwrr_Ff{x=k|Fh?HLV<9VM>(=?utf-8?q?f=242!x=7Cc=0A=09f=23=5C1C-=7Efm=5BH9=2E3Hhnio=60G1Y8=27ZBjYlS?= =?utf-8?q?qY-=3FNL=5BAt=25lVW+Qsvu?=)WWNowdDq`xf]( =?utf-8?q?=60=3F7Ius=7E=0A=09?=@y$h+pt4o]O~e53Q5>J8nD9,o1>?foy&,`@kwRz"N4Z7ZFNjhOJFmk{6}#W( =?utf-8?q?X+=27U=25kq*MB=0A=09qUJYDRH=26=5F0g=2EBuAo8=231HV-e!9=7Df6?= X-No-Archive: yes Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508112344.43357.Peter.Ruskin@dsl.pipex.com> X-Archives-Salt: 45f00dc2-eb53-4ebe-b520-c3e58edff3c4 X-Archives-Hash: ca93e5d144040f53a9383de4f2c99992 On Thursday 11 August 2005 19:32, Alexander Skwar wrote: > I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo > *REALLY* require pam? No, it certainly does not need pam. Have a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71898, especially Comment #6. -- Peter ======================================================================== Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.51.22-r2. kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r6. i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.3.5-20050130. KDE: 3.4.2. Qt: 3.3.4. ======================================================================== -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list