public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam?
@ 2005-08-11 18:32 Alexander Skwar
  2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
  2005-08-11 22:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter Ruskin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2005-08-11 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hi!

I'm building a USE=-pam system and thus don't have pam installed.
Now I wanted to compile openoffice and found, that it would install
pam:

server tmp # USE="-*" emerge -vpt app-office/openoffice
These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N    ] app-office/openoffice-1.1.4-r1  -curl -hardened -java -kde -nptl -zlib 215,331 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2  -berkdb -nis -pam_chroot -pam_console -pam_timestamp -pwdb (-selinux) 562 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  app-shells/tcsh-6.14  -perl 883 kB

I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
*REALLY* require pam?

Regards,

Alexander Skwar
-- 
This is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.  And now you know why.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 18:32 [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam? Alexander Skwar
@ 2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
  2005-08-11 20:40   ` Bastian Balthazar Bux
  2005-08-11 21:55   ` [gentoo-user] " Christer Ekholm
  2005-08-11 22:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter Ruskin
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2005-08-11 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 420 bytes --]

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:32:26 +0200 Alexander Skwar
<listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
| I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
| *REALLY* require pam?

No, but tcsh does, and openoffice's build system requires tcsh.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2005-08-11 20:40   ` Bastian Balthazar Bux
  2005-08-11 20:54     ` Andreas Fredriksson
  2005-08-11 21:55   ` [gentoo-user] " Christer Ekholm
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bastian Balthazar Bux @ 2005-08-11 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:32:26 +0200 Alexander Skwar
> <listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
> | I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
> | *REALLY* require pam?
> 
> No, but tcsh does, and openoffice's build system requires tcsh.
> 
So it's possible to

#emerge -Ca app-shells/tcsh
#emerge -p --depclean
[have a nice reading]
#emerge --depclean

To get rid of them after them after ?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 20:40   ` Bastian Balthazar Bux
@ 2005-08-11 20:54     ` Andreas Fredriksson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fredriksson @ 2005-08-11 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On 8/11/05, Bastian Balthazar Bux <BastianBalthazarBux@pnpitalia.it> wrote:

> So it's possible to
> 
> #emerge -Ca app-shells/tcsh
> #emerge -p --depclean
> [have a nice reading]
> #emerge --depclean
> 
> To get rid of them after them after ?

Couldn't you use the binary ooo package to avoid the build-time dependency?

Regards,
Andreas
-- 
And I hate redundancy, and having different functions for the same thing.
        - Linus Torvalds on linux-kernel

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user]  Re: Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
  2005-08-11 20:40   ` Bastian Balthazar Bux
@ 2005-08-11 21:55   ` Christer Ekholm
  2005-08-11 22:17     ` Tim Igoe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christer Ekholm @ 2005-08-11 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> writes:

> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:32:26 +0200 Alexander Skwar
> <listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
> | I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
> | *REALLY* require pam?
>
> No, but tcsh does, and openoffice's build system requires tcsh.

Is that really true. The simple experiment I just did (below), I
interpreet as it's openoffice that wants pam.

23:52:25 poke:~ $sudo emerge -Dpv openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies -
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-libs/pam" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-libs/pam-0.77-r8 (masked by: package.mask)
- sys-libs/pam-0.77-r6 (masked by: package.mask)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.
!!!    (dependency required by "app-office/openoffice-1.1.4-r1" [ebuild])

23:52:33 poke:~ $sudo emerge -Dpv tcsh

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] app-shells/tcsh-6.14  +perl 0 kB 

Total size of downloads: 0 kB

--
 Christer

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 21:55   ` [gentoo-user] " Christer Ekholm
@ 2005-08-11 22:17     ` Tim Igoe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tim Igoe @ 2005-08-11 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2020 bytes --]



Christer Ekholm wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> writes:
> 
> 
>>On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:32:26 +0200 Alexander Skwar
>><listen@alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
>>| I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
>>| *REALLY* require pam?
>>
>>No, but tcsh does, and openoffice's build system requires tcsh.
> 
> 
> Is that really true. The simple experiment I just did (below), I
> interpreet as it's openoffice that wants pam.

Taken from the OOo ebuild

DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
        >=sys-apps/findutils-4.1.20-r1
        app-shells/tcsh
        dev-util/pkgconfig
        curl? ( net-misc/curl )
        zlib? ( sys-libs/zlib )
        sys-libs/pam
        !dev-util/dmake
        java? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4.1 )
        !java? ( dev-libs/libxslt )"

thus is OOo thats bringing in pam.

I suppose, if you don't want pam, you could try removing the
sys-libs/pam line from the ebuild and seeing what happens :)

> 
> 23:52:25 poke:~ $sudo emerge -Dpv openoffice
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies -
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-libs/pam" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
> - sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (masked by: package.mask)
> - sys-libs/pam-0.77-r8 (masked by: package.mask)
> - sys-libs/pam-0.77-r6 (masked by: package.mask)
> 
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
> section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.
> !!!    (dependency required by "app-office/openoffice-1.1.4-r1" [ebuild])
> 
> 23:52:33 poke:~ $sudo emerge -Dpv tcsh
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild   R   ] app-shells/tcsh-6.14  +perl 0 kB 
> 
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
> 
> --
>  Christer
> 

-- 
Tim Igoe
tim@igoe.me.uk
http://tim.igoe.me.uk - Personal Site
http://tv.igoe.me.uk - UK TV Guide

"Computers are like Air-con, open windows and they stop working!"

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam?
  2005-08-11 18:32 [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam? Alexander Skwar
  2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
@ 2005-08-11 22:44 ` Peter Ruskin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ruskin @ 2005-08-11 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Thursday 11 August 2005 19:32, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> I don't really want to install pam just because of OOo. Does OOo
> *REALLY* require pam?

No, it certainly does not need pam.  Have a look at 
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71898, especially Comment 
#6.

-- 
Peter
========================================================================
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.51.22-r2.	kernel-2.6.12-gentoo-r6.
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+.		gcc(GCC): 3.3.5-20050130.
KDE: 3.4.2.				Qt: 3.3.4.
========================================================================
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-11 22:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-11 18:32 [gentoo-user] Does openoffice really require pam? Alexander Skwar
2005-08-11 19:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-08-11 20:40   ` Bastian Balthazar Bux
2005-08-11 20:54     ` Andreas Fredriksson
2005-08-11 21:55   ` [gentoo-user] " Christer Ekholm
2005-08-11 22:17     ` Tim Igoe
2005-08-11 22:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Peter Ruskin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox