From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2awJ-0006lS-Df for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:43:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j79Kfl1G000234; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:41:47 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j79Ka7FF031674 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:36:07 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5649A2A8334 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0435A2A7734 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:36:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 7014969 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:36:00 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which filesystem for a notebook? Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:36:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <42F7D154.7050106@mid.email-server.info> <42F8F27F.5030303@gonoph.net> <200508092046.23474.trapni@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200508092046.23474.trapni@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508092236.00417.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 5578fdcc-be1f-4b1b-aaa0-1f7bcab1ffb5 X-Archives-Hash: 2b8b2d06af93d5942fc03088a3ba7538 On Tuesday 09 August 2005 20:46, Christian Parpart wrote: > However, I once have (accidently!) thrown down one harddrive of mine from > within 60cm distance down while moving to a new tower/rac; I were nearly > crying about, but before, I quickly invoked fsck.xfs on my LVM (which this > disk is part of) and *really* got confused. > fsck.xfs is really a no-op. I couldn't figure out yet why. I can now just > pray that everything seems to go just well (as it does till now ;) hm, some harddisks tell you in their smart-data, if the shock was over a certain safety threshold. Maybe you should use your copy of smartmontools and copy your data onto a different disk ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list