* [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system?
@ 2005-08-04 18:19 Alexander Skwar
2005-08-04 19:20 ` Willie Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2005-08-04 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi!
Is it possible to compile the complete system with the
icc from the Intel C++ Compiler?
Are there any (performance) gains to be expected on a
system using a Celeron M340 CPU?
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
BOFH Excuse #69:
knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system?
2005-08-04 18:19 [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system? Alexander Skwar
@ 2005-08-04 19:20 ` Willie Wong
2005-08-04 19:39 ` Willie Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Willie Wong @ 2005-08-04 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to compile the complete system with the
> icc from the Intel C++ Compiler?
afaik, no. Too many things rely on gcc-specific extensions.
BUT! if you add "icc" to your USEflags, portage will compile things
with icc whenever the compile is known not to break. (=
>
> Are there any (performance) gains to be expected on a
> system using a Celeron M340 CPU?
>
Most likely. I remember seeing benchmarks showing that gcc is
dead-slow compared to icc. But then again, other benchmarks can show
comparable performance. My only advice is to try it out if you really
want to know.
W
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander Skwar
> --
> BOFH Excuse #69:
>
> knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
A fine is a tax for doing wrong.
A tax is a fine for doing well.
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 4 days, 2:41
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system?
2005-08-04 19:20 ` Willie Wong
@ 2005-08-04 19:39 ` Willie Wong
2005-08-05 4:44 ` Alexander Skwar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Willie Wong @ 2005-08-04 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:20:43PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is it possible to compile the complete system with the
> > icc from the Intel C++ Compiler?
>
> afaik, no. Too many things rely on gcc-specific extensions.
> BUT! if you add "icc" to your USEflags, portage will compile things
> with icc whenever the compile is known not to break. (=
>
scratch that. You also need to set the $CC yourself plus a lot of
hocuspocus. Check
http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ICC_and_Portage&e=912
> >
> > Are there any (performance) gains to be expected on a
> > system using a Celeron M340 CPU?
> >
>
> Most likely. I remember seeing benchmarks showing that gcc is
> dead-slow compared to icc. But then again, other benchmarks can show
> comparable performance. My only advice is to try it out if you really
> want to know.
>
> W
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alexander Skwar
> > --
> > BOFH Excuse #69:
> >
> > knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> --
> A fine is a tax for doing wrong.
> A tax is a fine for doing well.
> Sortir en Pantoufles: up 4 days, 2:41
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong
and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a
thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually
turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- One of the laws of computers and programming revealed.
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 4 days, 2:55
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system?
2005-08-04 19:39 ` Willie Wong
@ 2005-08-05 4:44 ` Alexander Skwar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Skwar @ 2005-08-05 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Willie Wong schrieb:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:20:43PM -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Is it possible to compile the complete system with the
>> > icc from the Intel C++ Compiler?
>>
>> afaik, no. Too many things rely on gcc-specific extensions.
>> BUT! if you add "icc" to your USEflags, portage will compile things
>> with icc whenever the compile is known not to break. (=
>>
>
> scratch that. You also need to set the $CC yourself plus a lot of
> hocuspocus. Check
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ICC_and_Portage&e=912
Hey, nice howto! I'll try to setup an icc system then.
Too bad, that some of the large packages like xorg don't
compile with icc :(
Cheers,
Alexander Skwar
--
Got protoplasm?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-05 4:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-04 18:19 [gentoo-user] Using Intel's icc to compile the whole system? Alexander Skwar
2005-08-04 19:20 ` Willie Wong
2005-08-04 19:39 ` Willie Wong
2005-08-05 4:44 ` Alexander Skwar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox