From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Du81C-0008Rb-7Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:13:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6HCAvS6027779; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:10:57 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6HC61eU026334 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:06:01 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 492D42A7A5C for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:06:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E595293DBF for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 6552257 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:06:31 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT?] Advice on hardware Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:06:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <342e1090507150806161c6f06@mail.gmail.com> <342e1090507162319726110e0@mail.gmail.com> <42DA0B0B.6090905@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <42DA0B0B.6090905@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507171406.31337.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: daac0554-c31b-4daf-90a5-5dea67899fd3 X-Archives-Hash: bbbf61751c9de7eff42c98a6b6d78a0a On Sunday 17 July 2005 09:38, Jarry wrote: > > Just my 2 cents. I have been using asus-products for about 7 years, > but I think asus is not the hardware-producer it used to be. Asus > still makes excelent mobo's for Intel, but its mobo's for AMD64 > are... well, imho only "average". Nothing more, nothing less. > For the same (or lower) price you could get much better product... > > If I would like to build a new comp today, I would probably go > with EpoX, DFI, Gigabyte or MSI motherboards... > I have good experience with Asrocks boards. Stable, not too slow, very cheap - and it is a daughter of asus. Their AMD boards are very usable. A friend of mine has a MSI and a lot of problems. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list