From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtwnZ-0007T0-PT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:14:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6H0D1LH011012; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:13:01 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6H07DDL014424 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:07:14 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F2572A88EF for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ACE2A88FE for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 6549754 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:07:44 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot emerge glibc Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:07:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507162142.j6GLg1D6019018@post.webmailer.de> <200507170044.58221.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <42D99053.6090400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42D99053.6090400@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507170207.44830.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: c9b68597-326d-4f4a-b01a-feabf4807fe9 X-Archives-Hash: b6c48e7bdf2a7541d717fc06ef97418f On Sunday 17 July 2005 00:55, Zac Medico wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl. > > So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible. > > No problems here. I'd expect people to do their own research before making > the switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need > be, right? yeah, but problems are known. So there are good reasons NOT to use ntplonly or to advise to use it generally. And if you mean 'reemerge glibc' you are right, you can always 'swap' them around. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list