From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DtvTV-0005fY-Vm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:49:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6GMmFiP018044; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:48:15 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6GMiRfx002083 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:44:27 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 69CFE2A8C7D for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6332A51F1 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:44:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 6549463 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:44:57 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot emerge glibc Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:44:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507162142.j6GLg1D6019018@post.webmailer.de> <42D98318.3030802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42D98318.3030802@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507170044.58221.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 862c2442-0d4f-49ea-9aa2-ea11b3e017a2 X-Archives-Hash: 8b8a9997984131870db0990dde62f2de On Saturday 16 July 2005 23:58, Zac Medico wrote: > Alexander Veit wrote: > > Zac Medico wrote: > >>Yep, here's another forum thread and an open bug: > >> > >>http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-343187-highlight-.html > >>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90236 > >> > >>I can tell you that it will work with i586 CHOST and > >>USE="nptl nptlonly". > > > > Hmm. I guess, on Linux Linux threads would be the appropriate threads. So > > I'll wait for this bug being fixed. > > > > Thank you > > Alex > > Linuxthreads are the *old* linux threading library and nplt is the *new* > linux threading library. I've been using nptlonly for a couple months now > with no noticeable problems. AFAICT it's a "drop in" replacement for > linuxthreads and it supposed to give superior performance. I'd recommend > it. but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl. So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list