* [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel @ 2005-07-09 0:58 Ian K 2005-07-09 1:20 ` Holly Bostick 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Ian K @ 2005-07-09 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo list Hi there, I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a 2.4 ebuild in the gentoo-sources package(?). How do I get it? Thanks!! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel 2005-07-09 0:58 [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Ian K @ 2005-07-09 1:20 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:37 ` [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Peng 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Ian K schreef: > Hi there, > I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but > gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked > gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a > 2.4 ebuild in the gentoo-sources package(?). As indeed there is: eix gentoo-sources * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 2.6.9-r9 2.6.10-r6 2.6.11-r8 2.6.11-r11 [M]2.6.12-r3 [M]2.6.12-r4 Installed: 2.6.11-r8 2.6.11-r11 Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources Description: Full sources including the gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree > How do I get it? Try this: emerge -av =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.4.28-r9 Don't forget to add >sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9 to /etc/portage/package.mask, or Portage will keep trying to upgrade you. If there's a 2.4-series upgrade, that will also be blocked, but you are likely to be keeping an eye open for any such updates, and can adjust your package.mask accordingly. > Thanks!! HTH, Holly -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel 2005-07-09 1:20 ` Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:44 ` Edward Catmur 2005-07-09 12:59 ` [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" Benno Schulenberg 2005-07-09 1:37 ` [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Peng 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user What I meant to say was: > Don't forget to add > > > ">sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9" > > > to /etc/portage/package.mask. Stupid Thunderbird needs an escape character (or does it have one and I just don't know it?). Anyway, there should be a 'greater-than" sign in fron of the package name, to mask all packages above it (which atm basically means all 2.6 series kernels). Holly -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 1:44 ` Edward Catmur 2005-07-09 12:59 ` [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" Benno Schulenberg 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Edward Catmur @ 2005-07-09 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 03:30 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote: > > Don't forget to add > > > > > > ">sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9" > > > > > > to /etc/portage/package.mask. Better would be to change profile to a 2.4 kernel profile. If you look in /usr/portage/profiles/... you will see that (probably) under your current profile there will be a 2.4 directory e.g. /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4/ which not only sets kernel to 2.4 but also makes other changes to stay compatible e.g. setting headers to 2.4 and setting dev-manager to devfsd instead of udev. So switch your /etc/make.profile symlink to a 2.4 profile and all will be happy. The wonders of Gentoo stackable profiles, indeed. Ed -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:44 ` Edward Catmur @ 2005-07-09 12:59 ` Benno Schulenberg 2005-07-09 13:21 ` Holly Bostick 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Benno Schulenberg @ 2005-07-09 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Holly Bostick wrote: > What I meant to say was: > > ">sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9" > > there should be a 'greater-than" sign in fron of the package name, There was a greater-than for me, in KMail, also in your first mail. Apparently Thunderbird hides it from you. But it should do that only for ">From " and nothing else. Bug in TB? Benno -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" 2005-07-09 12:59 ` [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" Benno Schulenberg @ 2005-07-09 13:21 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 14:19 ` Peng 2005-07-09 18:17 ` Richard Fish 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Benno Schulenberg schreef: > Holly Bostick wrote: > >>What I meant to say was: >> >>>">sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9" >> >>there should be a 'greater-than" sign in fron of the package name, > > > There was a greater-than for me, in KMail, also in your first mail. > Apparently Thunderbird hides it from you. But it should do that > only for ">From " and nothing else. Bug in TB? > > Benno Yes and no-- the ">" character is the symbol used to distinguish quotes from regular text-- and Thunderbird converts this character to a colored vertical line, so that quoted text looks like this when displayed: | here is my quoted text | and here is some more. I don't have an issue with this behaviour in general (in fact, I like the way quoted text is signified under normal circumstances). The problem is that, in this particular case, the ">" character was the first non-whitespace character in the line, and T-Bird had no way of knowing that it was not intended to represent a traditional quote signifier, but was meant to remain itself. That is, of course, the whole point of escape characters; to tell the program in question that a character it has a standard meaning for should in this particular case not be "translated" to that meaning, but is meant to be "just itself". The situation happens very rarely to me, but it's 'obvious' enough (especially to programmers and scripters, who use escape characters all the time) that I'm sure there must be some workaround for it for Thunderbird (since this is Thunderbird-specific behaviour, which I have noticed in the past, as well as the fact that KMail, for example, does not do this); I just don't know what it is. If there isn't, that *would* be a bug. I'll check MozillaZine and Google later.... Mozdev seems to like to hide this stuff. If you've ever tried to find the list of command-line switches for Netscape/Moz/Firefox on the Internet, you'll know exactly what I mean. Holly -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" 2005-07-09 13:21 ` Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 14:19 ` Peng 2005-07-09 15:05 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 18:17 ` Richard Fish 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peng @ 2005-07-09 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 7/9/05, Holly Bostick <motub@planet.nl> wrote: > Benno Schulenberg schreef: > > Holly Bostick wrote: > > > >>What I meant to say was: > >> > >>>">sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9" > >> > >>there should be a 'greater-than" sign in fron of the package name, > > > > > > There was a greater-than for me, in KMail, also in your first mail. > > Apparently Thunderbird hides it from you. But it should do that > > only for ">From " and nothing else. Bug in TB? > > > > Benno > > > Yes and no-- the ">" character is the symbol used to distinguish quotes > from regular text-- and Thunderbird converts this character to a colored > vertical line, so that quoted text looks like this when displayed: > > | here is my quoted text > | and here is some more. > > I don't have an issue with this behaviour in general (in fact, I like > the way quoted text is signified under normal circumstances). The > problem is that, in this particular case, the ">" character was the > first non-whitespace character in the line, and T-Bird had no way of > knowing that it was not intended to represent a traditional quote > signifier, but was meant to remain itself. That is, of course, the whole > point of escape characters; to tell the program in question that a > character it has a standard meaning for should in this particular case > not be "translated" to that meaning, but is meant to be "just itself". > > The situation happens very rarely to me, but it's 'obvious' enough > (especially to programmers and scripters, who use escape characters all > the time) that I'm sure there must be some workaround for it for > Thunderbird (since this is Thunderbird-specific behaviour, which I have > noticed in the past, as well as the fact that KMail, for example, does > not do this); I just don't know what it is. > > If there isn't, that *would* be a bug. I'll check MozillaZine and Google > later.... Mozdev seems to like to hide this stuff. If you've ever tried > to find the list of command-line switches for Netscape/Moz/Firefox on > the Internet, you'll know exactly what I mean. > > Holly What do you mean about the command line switches? The Mozilla.org page about them is right at the top if you Google "Mozilla command line". Also, for Thunderbird, pretty much any character could be used, though that character would be displayed, too, of course. I think even a pipe would work. They are used for quotes sometimes, though, I think, so maybe another character would be better. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" 2005-07-09 14:19 ` Peng @ 2005-07-09 15:05 ` Holly Bostick 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Peng schreef: >>I'll check MozillaZine and Google >>later.... Mozdev seems to like to hide this stuff. If you've ever tried >>to find the list of command-line switches for Netscape/Moz/Firefox on >>the Internet, you'll know exactly what I mean. >> >>Holly > > > What do you mean about the command line switches? The Mozilla.org page > about them is right at the top if you Google "Mozilla command line". So it is.... now... but look at the date of this document: Mozilla's Command Line Options By Daniel Wang (May 7, 2003, revised June 02, 2004) I've been using this program long, long, before this (Netscape=>Mozilla=>Firefox, some 8 or 10 years, thus), and I'm much more used to having a hard time finding this information (which is basically the same as it has been since Netscape 4.3x, in terms of starting the Profile Manager and such), than to it being easy. It's good to know that it's much more readily available, though. > > Also, for Thunderbird, pretty much any character could be used, though > that character would be displayed, too, of course. I think even a pipe > would work. They are used for quotes sometimes, though, I think, so > maybe another character would be better. Yes, the obvious workaround is to put double quotes around it as I did in the edit. I just dislike that, because, to be thorough, you also then have to add a "don't forget to remove the quotes" disclaimer in order to be newbie-friendly. But here, I can *probably* be a bit more lax and trust you all to be clever enough to know that already :) . Holly -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" 2005-07-09 13:21 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 14:19 ` Peng @ 2005-07-09 18:17 ` Richard Fish 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Fish @ 2005-07-09 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Holly Bostick wrote: >The situation happens very rarely to me, but it's 'obvious' enough >(especially to programmers and scripters, who use escape characters all >the time) that I'm sure there must be some workaround for it for >Thunderbird (since this is Thunderbird-specific behaviour, which I have >noticed in the past, as well as the fact that KMail, for example, does >not do this); I just don't know what it is. > > > View->Message Source. That will show you the un-adulterated original text of the message, but it shows up in a second window. If you find something to display the actual message text in the normal display window, let me know!!! -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel 2005-07-09 1:20 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick @ 2005-07-09 1:37 ` Peng 2005-07-09 2:31 ` Tero Grundström 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peng @ 2005-07-09 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 7/8/05, Holly Bostick <motub@planet.nl> wrote: > Ian K schreef: > > Hi there, > > I need to get a 2.4 kernel onto a system, but > > gentoo-sources now gives 2.6. I checked > > gentoo-portage.com and it says that there is still a > > 2.4 ebuild in the gentoo-sources package(?). > > As indeed there is: > > eix gentoo-sources > * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 2.6.9-r9 2.6.10-r6 2.6.11-r8 > 2.6.11-r11 [M]2.6.12-r3 [M]2.6.12-r4 > Installed: 2.6.11-r8 2.6.11-r11 > Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources > Description: Full sources including the gentoo patchset for > the 2.6 kernel tree > > > > How do I get it? > > Try this: > > emerge -av =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.4.28-r9 > > > Don't forget to add > > >sys-kernel-2.4.28-r9 > > to /etc/portage/package.mask, or Portage will keep trying to upgrade > you. If there's a 2.4-series upgrade, that will also be blocked, but you > are likely to be keeping an eye open for any such updates, and can > adjust your package.mask accordingly. > > > Thanks!! > > HTH, > Holly Could it be possible to mask >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5 to block all 2.6 kernels but no 2.4s? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel 2005-07-09 1:37 ` [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Peng @ 2005-07-09 2:31 ` Tero Grundström 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Tero Grundström @ 2005-07-09 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Peng wrote: > Could it be possible to mask >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5 to block > all 2.6 kernels but no 2.4s? That works and you'll also get the updates to the 2.4.x kernel with 'emerge -u world'. -- T.G. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-09 18:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-07-09 0:58 [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Ian K 2005-07-09 1:20 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:30 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 1:44 ` Edward Catmur 2005-07-09 12:59 ` [gentoo-user] Thunderbird ">" Benno Schulenberg 2005-07-09 13:21 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 14:19 ` Peng 2005-07-09 15:05 ` Holly Bostick 2005-07-09 18:17 ` Richard Fish 2005-07-09 1:37 ` [gentoo-user] Emerging old kernel Peng 2005-07-09 2:31 ` Tero Grundström
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox