* Re: [gentoo-user] Local portage repository
[not found] ` <20041204181420.3bdd7c24@snowdrop.home>
@ 2004-12-05 0:15 ` Collins Richey
2004-12-05 0:29 ` Andrew Cowie
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Collins Richey @ 2004-12-05 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:14:20 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:36:18 +0530 Andrew Cowie
> <andrew@operationaldynamics.com> wrote:
> | I would refine that, however, to /opt being a place where things
> | outside of package control are permitted [my personal view, now FHS or
> | Gentoo policy or anything] whereas anything going into /usr MUST be
> | under the OS's discipline.
> |
> | For instance, I untar the binary blob I get from download.eclipse.org
> | in out in /opt/eclipse, that sort of thing.
>
> Guess I might as well explain Gentoo policy on this.
>
> /usr is for portage-installed apps. Don't install your own things with
> --prefix=/usr, portage is totally entitled to clobber them as it sees
> fit.
>
> /usr/local is for user-installed apps. Portage-installed apps won't
> touch this.
>
> /opt is used by portage for some packages which are not built from
> source (typically packages which come in foo and foo-bin variants).
> There are certain developers who want this behaviour changed (or better
> yet, -bin packages removed) :)
>
Agreed, except for removing the -bin packages. OTOH, Ciaran, this
doesn't quite explain your regard for /opt as an abomination.
--
Collins
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Local portage repository
[not found] ` <20041204181420.3bdd7c24@snowdrop.home>
2004-12-05 0:15 ` [gentoo-user] Local portage repository Collins Richey
@ 2004-12-05 0:29 ` Andrew Cowie
2004-12-05 11:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2004-12-05 19:07 ` George Garvey
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cowie @ 2004-12-05 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 725 bytes --]
Thanks for your Gentoo policy clarification.
On Sat, 2004-04-12 at 18:14 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> /opt is used by portage for some packages which are not built from
> source (typically packages which come in foo and foo-bin variants).
Indeed.
It occurs to me that I would be better off placing the binary blobs I
install (that I'm placing by my own preference into /opt "somewhere")
into something along the lines of /opt/local
AfC
Singapore
--
Andrew Frederick Cowie
OPERATIONAL DYNAMICS
Operations Consultants and Infrastructure Engineers
http://www.operationaldynamics.com/
Sydney: +61 2 9977 6866
New York: +1 646 472 5054
Toronto: +1 416 848 6072
London: +44 207 1019201
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Local portage repository
[not found] ` <20041204181420.3bdd7c24@snowdrop.home>
2004-12-05 0:15 ` [gentoo-user] Local portage repository Collins Richey
2004-12-05 0:29 ` Andrew Cowie
@ 2004-12-05 11:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2004-12-05 19:07 ` George Garvey
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2004-12-05 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 650 bytes --]
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:14:20 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> There are certain developers who want this behaviour changed (or
> better yet, -bin packages removed) :)
I hope these developers will first ensure that the source variants of
these packages compile and run cleanly on all platforms. OOo doesn't
compile on amd64.
I agree with you about /opt, it seems pointless, and means you need an
extra partition if you want a minimal root partition. If binaries need a
separate location, what's wrong with /usr/opt?I think you may get
objections trying to get /usr/crap implemented :)
--
Neil Bothwick
The thrill of victory, the agony of delete.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Local portage repository
[not found] ` <20041204181420.3bdd7c24@snowdrop.home>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-05 11:54 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2004-12-05 19:07 ` George Garvey
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: George Garvey @ 2004-12-05 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 06:14:20PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> /usr is for portage-installed apps. Don't install your own things with
> /usr/local is for user-installed apps. Portage-installed apps won't
> /opt is used by portage for some packages which are not built from
What about stuff in /usr/local/portage that is not also in
/usr/portage? Is it reasonable/okay to install that in /usr instead of
/usr/local? It is being managed by portage, just not the Gentoo devs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-05 19:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.BSO.4.58.0412021143530.12734@ida.bway.net>
[not found] ` <20041202170711.1cd5ef0d@snowdrop.home>
[not found] ` <200412021126.52687.bss03@volumehost.com>
[not found] ` <20041202184849.48864ad7@snowdrop.home>
[not found] ` <20041203054951.GA5375@bugs.md.com.my>
[not found] ` <20041203141946.494a74ec@snowdrop.home>
[not found] ` <41B08C09.2050106@gonoph.net>
[not found] ` <e00942e404120309265f0c908d@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1102140378.4995.36.camel@procyon.operationaldynamics.com>
[not found] ` <20041204181420.3bdd7c24@snowdrop.home>
2004-12-05 0:15 ` [gentoo-user] Local portage repository Collins Richey
2004-12-05 0:29 ` Andrew Cowie
2004-12-05 11:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2004-12-05 19:07 ` George Garvey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox