From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgJVT-0003aR-Bq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:11:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jARAAkSQ021760; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:10:46 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jARA6Xv6025442 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:06:34 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i3so1986296wra for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 02:06:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EJrlOs3xrMoAbItY86Yk/ats8gtdpbjMMoaQ4m8floO2yUAHAPMe478lTgwLtav+oBlvzqDmaheMKjVx8iezRuUqJRYc7mvDQ5RqTfRySSvr3jHHwNL+iXi6IUXIz5SYTDXCXGN2DYFVlzuGqnuBqBYXfZq1e9LDlXqHKIvtUTI= Received: by 10.54.151.6 with SMTP id y6mr3746185wrd; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 02:06:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.97.6 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 02:06:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1eae200b0511270206k2ce9e2au@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:06:33 +0100 From: Martin Tedjawardhana To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] best filesystem for Gentoo In-Reply-To: <43893428.9080005@btinternet.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6853_31758867.1133085993045" References: <43893428.9080005@btinternet.com> X-Archives-Salt: ff23f88a-82f0-47b3-8c6b-6482e13549ae X-Archives-Hash: 1e78fff160057a8a302591c2c25641f1 ------=_Part_6853_31758867.1133085993045 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Have a look at this benchmark http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html and the interview article http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3D69 Someone mentioned that reiserfs slows down after a while because of fragmentation, to be honest I've been running a quite busy web/file storage server using reiserfs for more than 1,5 years without any noticeable slowin= g down. On 27/11/05, Colin Copley wrote: > > Hi List, > > Any comment on the best filesystem to use for Gentoo running a > webserver, I prefer more speed and less journaling, is there a standard? > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > ------=_Part_6853_31758867.1133085993045 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Have a look at this benchmark http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html and the interview article http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3D69

Someone mentioned that reiserfs slows down after a while because of fragmentation, to be honest I've been running a quite busy web/file storage server using reiserfs for more than 1,5 years without any noticeable slowing down.

On 27/11/0= 5, Colin Copley <cmc.75@btinternet.com> wrote:
Hi List,

Any comment on the best filesystem to use for Gentoo runnin= g  a
webserver, I prefer more speed and less journaling, is th= ere a standard?
--
gentoo-u= ser@gentoo.org mailing list


------=_Part_6853_31758867.1133085993045-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list