From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R5hD7-0001dr-By for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:00:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2193D21C216; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0D021C175 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-fx0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 2so4880190fxh.40 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=+WMs9l9qyTEymtD+Q1SWZLOJ9usV/Ah87qqxjVOtetg=; b=ShYxUsHdVRzLQmFmxQvtw2gRah4fjsfBDpVZZZhd86+UVeQe5PwCN3lbWD2VL72VEh N+ssIFZcbrU3grIIHn/ZlBpPk5ZxgkXu2YEHFtGsnOxiLFj9MvjkiuWmy9iCpDd/ZfcI qf31pa7areiCgnIt0S0b8I6NU2heo61b3Ruqk= Received: by 10.223.37.68 with SMTP id w4mr15066fad.49.1316451429858; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC74389.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.199.67.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n12sm18870255fan.9.2011.09.19.09.57.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev + /usr Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:36:18 +0200 Message-ID: <19669041.lgH4hlFvt1@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.1 (Linux/3.0.4; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3364181.6HemjMXEQU@pc> References: <20110912150248.GB3599@acm.acm> <20110919162231.28a45235@rohan.example.com> <3364181.6HemjMXEQU@pc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a7e4e665304ed48626088630f15df998 Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: > On Monday, 19. September 2011 16:22:31 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:41 +0200 > > > > Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > The 17/09/11, pk wrote: > > > > dbus is installed in my system, but only because I run Xfce4 (I > > > > am > > > > thinking of installing something else due to it's becoming > > > > bloated > > > > just like gnome). And I have "-dbus" in my global make.conf. > > > > > > > > PS. I am quite astonished at the fact that I have a computer > > > > that is > > > > _way_ faster than the first machine I installed GNU/Linux (an > > > > Amiga > > > > 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz) on but the "experience" is still > > > > the same; it takes about the same time to boot, the same time > > > > (or > > > > even slower) to load a program. It seems the faster the computer > > > > the more I have to wait for it to finish some task. > > > > Contradictory, > > > > no? Wonder why that is... (bloat?). > > > > > > Believe it or not but I bet you're not doing the same tasks with > > > your > > > modern machine and could just not run the user-end software you use > > > today on a Amiga 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz because they learn > > > new > > > feature since then. > > : > > :-) Example: > > Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even manage to > > display the Gentoo logo at http://www.gentoo.org. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origyn_Web_Browser and I am sure that it will display pngs and jpegs with full colours just fine. I am sure displaying 2 or 4 MP pictures will be working great. Just like the mpeg4 you are trying to watch. Or the ogv. > > > And forget all about playing music. well, the amiga can play mp3. But don't expect it to be usable for anything else while doing so. So watching a music video while having a douzend wikipedia-tabs open and a mailbox with 60000 mails replying to one? No, not really. -- #163933