From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE753138D01 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0751E0D76; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601C4E0D59 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:06:19 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,821,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="62998779" Received: from unknown (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.89]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2014 00:06:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.11.101] (unknown [192.168.11.101]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40BDABF2F for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:03:43 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] User eix-sync permissions problem From: Stroller In-Reply-To: <20140210235755.GA19782@waltdnes.org> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:05:46 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1954A216-291A-4873-8E81-335B739F38F8@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <197AEEF5-2BA3-43BF-944E-A5C4230D4CFB@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20140210190344.GB17128@waltdnes.org> <52F92894.2050809@gmail.com> <52F95C7A.6010903@fastmail.co.uk> <20140210235755.GA19782@waltdnes.org> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Archives-Salt: ddd6492d-15a4-4207-8978-3f508b78f391 X-Archives-Hash: 811cf2b3878109178677960f7d399c34 On Mon, 10 February 2014, at 11:57 pm, Walter Dnes = wrote: >> ... >> There is no subsequent requirement not to invoke emerge --sync as = root. >=20 > What's the point, if you still have to run as root (or su or sudo) = for > the emerge update process? To reduce the number of times the user has to enter an admin password. I was going to write "not only is it a hassle, but it's also a security = risk", but I'm suddenly doubting myself, considering the consequences of = allowing user write-access to the portage tree. Stroller.