From: Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] About to have fiber internet and need VPN info
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:42:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1943882.usQuhbGJ8B@dell_xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e273af44-dbfe-502e-8ed5-4830352c189b@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2778 bytes --]
On Saturday, 6 August 2022 12:08:30 BST Dale wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 6 August 2022 07:07:26 BST Dale wrote:
> >>> Well, that settles that then. I guess it will be Surfshark. Pretty
> >>> sure it is in the Netherlands but may be wrong on country. I just
> >>> recall it being outside US jurisdiction. I also read they have been
> >>> audited by independent people to ensure they have no logs even if asked.
> >>
> >> Surfshark gets good reviews and it offers the wireguard protocol with the
> >> ChaCha20 cipher for better encryption and performance. However, the
> >> Netherlands is part of the EU and 14 eyes, so I would think similar state
> >> powers exist to access your private communications and the ISPs would
> >> have no way of refusing and staying in business. Surfshark offers a
> >> warrant canary, but it looks more like a marketing statement to me when
> >> you compare it to something like the Qubes digitally signed canaries.
> >
> > I forgot about the 14 eyes thing. Do you know of one outside that that
> > is good? The bad thing about most, they are pricey if done by the month
> > for testing. You only get a good deal if you subscribe for a year or
> > even two years. I don't want to subscribe and then find out it is a bad
> > one.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-) :-)
>
> I did a quick google search and Surfshark is based in British Virgin
> Islands and is outside the eyes countries. I was thinking it was
> Netherlands but wasn't sure.
You were thinking correctly at the start. Surfshark is located in the
Netherlands since 2018 and has been bought out by Nord Security, who owns
NordVPN.
> When I searched for VPN outside 14 eyes
> country, Surfshark is highly rated. Depending on the site, it's in the
> top few each time.
>
> https://earthweb.com/vpn-outside-14-eyes/
>
> https://www.privateproxyguide.com/best-vpn-outside-14-eyes/
>
> Unless there is some good reason to avoid, still thinking of using it.
The more you try to escape the 14 eyes Big Brother, the closer you may fall
into the hands of various authoritarian regimes. LOL! Even VPNs like NordVPN
which operates within the jurisdiction of Panama (let's not forget it is
Langley's doorstep), it also has offices in the UK, Netherlands and Lithuania.
I wonder why . . .
Total privacy on the Internet is improbable. If your only concern is to
retain your privacy from your ISP with regards to your Internet connections,
then most/any VPN service will offer this benefit by obfuscating your IP
address. Your browsing patterns, browser User Agent, addons and umpteen other
OS and application fingerprints won't be obfuscated beyond the VPN server.
Therefore your identity can only be protected so much and no more.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-06 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-16 10:57 [gentoo-user] About to have fiber internet and need VPN info Dale
2022-07-16 11:23 ` Federico J. Denkena
2022-07-18 9:23 ` Adam Carter
2022-07-16 13:21 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-07-16 16:41 ` Dale
2022-07-18 9:34 ` Adam Carter
2022-08-05 23:09 ` thelma
2022-07-16 17:00 ` Mark Knecht
2022-07-16 17:17 ` Dale
2022-07-16 17:44 ` Mark Knecht
2022-07-16 17:53 ` Michael
2022-08-04 22:32 ` Dale
2022-08-04 22:46 ` Michael
2022-08-05 20:45 ` Dale
2022-08-05 22:39 ` Michael
2022-08-06 6:07 ` Dale
2022-08-06 8:32 ` Michael
2022-08-06 10:59 ` Dale
2022-08-06 11:08 ` Dale
2022-08-06 12:41 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-08-06 12:42 ` Michael [this message]
2022-08-07 6:06 ` William Kenworthy
2022-08-07 15:36 ` Michael
2022-08-07 18:27 ` Rich Freeman
2022-08-07 19:30 ` Michael
2022-08-08 16:34 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-08 23:04 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-08-08 23:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2022-08-09 8:50 ` Michael
2022-08-09 16:21 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-05 14:53 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-05 23:05 ` Wol
2022-08-05 23:36 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-08-08 16:25 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-08 23:07 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-08-08 23:33 ` Neil Bothwick
2022-08-09 16:06 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-09 18:20 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-08-08 16:19 ` Laurence Perkins
2022-08-06 11:38 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1943882.usQuhbGJ8B@dell_xps \
--to=confabulate@kintzios.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox