From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69801381F3 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06B1BE096C; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from puchmayr.linznet.at (unknown [91.142.17.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E846E0961 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 14:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29011 invoked by uid 210); 7 Jul 2013 12:06:40 -0000 Received: from zeus.local by persephone (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.05st (clamdscan: 0.97.3/14948. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.05st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.2):. Processed in 1.237431 secs); 07 Jul 2013 12:06:40 -0000 Received: from zeus.local (HELO zeus.localnet) (192.168.1.2) by persephone.local with SMTP; 7 Jul 2013 12:06:37 -0000 From: Alexander Puchmayr To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99% Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:06:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1942674.qjWW39NOTY@zeus> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.8.13-gentoo; KDE/4.10.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <51d89268.18rUD/25Ld7ywsD2%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <1750135.6IRHZHqc9Q@zeus> <51d89268.18rUD/25Ld7ywsD2%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: b350eaa8-2213-41a1-a871-d33c3b94d6cc X-Archives-Hash: 0ee2cf8b05885f974448201328613919 On Samstag, 6. Juli 2013, 23:55:52 Joerg Schilling wrote: [...] > > > > Any ideas what could have gone wrong? > > It is interesting that there is no error message in the output from your > attachment. > > k3b should usew cdrecord instead of growisofs in case that cdrecord is > installed. Is cdrecord missing or why did k3b use growisofs? > > Did you explicitely try cdrecord? > Hi, cdrecord is installed, I have no idea why k3b chose to use growisofs for creating the >10G isofs. I did not try cdrecord (How can I change which programs k3b uses?) Alex