From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QvSv2-0000Bu-AY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:43:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADEE021C1A3; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4796221C183 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.144] (helo=smtp13.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvStm-0003np-Om for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:42:34 +0200 Received: from 5ed027a1.cm-7-1a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([94.208.39.161] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp13.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvStl-0002cM-Dl for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AABDCF6 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:46:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMN2e7EafRwx for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:46:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F02C26 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:46:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Joost Roeleveld To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:42:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1917430.4cT7ToFnvP@eve> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4E522FF7.3000005@xunil.at> References: <4E4C2CC4.6080604@xunil.at> <4747747.zDs8sH8AS8@eve> <4E522FF7.3000005@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QvStl-0002cM-Dl X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=0.34, vereist 5, BAYES_05 -0.50, KHOP_DYNAMIC 0.91, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98, RP_MATCHES_RCVD -1.05) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: de9cbd4f9c7fbb9bdbdef4055c3341f1 On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:31:19 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld: > > Are they actually started in the right order? > > In other words, first RAID, then LVM? > > I don't know ;-) > > I still try to understand all this. > There is no specific RAID-service-file, so it seems to be done by udev > and the related target/service somehow. > > > lvm.service says > > After=udev-settle.service > > so udev should detect all devices first, then lvm.service gets started. > > But somehow this doesn't work here, only after hitting that timeout one > time. That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean up when it fails. What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely on a module that is loaded in the background? In which case you could try adding that module as a dependency? -- Joost