From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA45D1389E2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFDB0E0D9F; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C2E0BB9 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz57R-000B7c-S0 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:53:29 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Clashing dependencies in KDE Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:53:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1886446.RhGxX4Z4Ed@wstn> Organization: Society for Retired Gentlefolk User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3815395.zRlHFf94Cm@wstn> References: <1701293.piBV2A0Zc2@wstn> <20141211111828.GC9210@AndTheirFacesAreTwistedWithThePainOfTheLiving.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <3815395.zRlHFf94Cm@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: ef23860c-1210-4e72-be2d-9c130501fa9a X-Archives-Hash: 64641aec02721796e359ba8fa10ff7bb On Thursday 11 December 2014 14:47:08 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2014 12:18:28 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > > As a final straw (or first option - depending on you preferences) you > > could resync the tree: maybe you've gotten an incomplete version/revbump > > that already is resolved in later versions of the tree. > > That did it - thanks. I see we have a new version of KDE today, and the > changes to the tree had only been partly completed. I should have thought > of that myself. > > Now to shut KDE down and upgrade it... I spoke too soon. I'm now seeing hundreds of file size errors, so clearly the update is still in progress. I'd better leave it until tomorrow. Thanks again anyway. -- Rgds Peter.