From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1221381F3 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2AB0E0AF6; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [5.9.116.23]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DBCE0AC6 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16936DC14F4 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (78-32-181-186.static.enta.net [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0354DC14EF for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:51 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:13:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1823961.b6Gd6v5fYI@wstn> Organization: Retired software quality manager User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <522F0E03.1070402@gmail.com> References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn> <522F0E03.1070402@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Sep 10 15:13:52 2013 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 522f292046961232510276 X-Archives-Salt: 4952a37b-5ad7-4962-b6db-f71fd22233f5 X-Archives-Hash: 903320fa5d13817140998bb9981e1ea2 On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Is it working for you, Dale? :-) > So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the 9999 version, > for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for > me?? O_O Seriously?? This is a joke right?? No joke, I assure you. As Markos pointed out, a bug has already been opened, and I fell over it with a vanilla make.conf. Unless someone knows of a work-around, I'll stick with the old version of portage until the bug-fix reaches the stable system. -- Regards, Peter