RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

["Timothy A. Holmes" <tholmes@mcaschool.net>]

> > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting
a
> > >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
> > >> >
> > >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per
> > >> > interface.
> > >>
> > >> Exactly, the current system gives the choice of setting it
globally
> or
> > >> per-interface in the same file.
> > >
> > > Can you please guide me how to set it up globally?
> >
> > It's all in /etc/conf.d/net.example.
> >
> > > I am not sure I can follow
> > > the otherwise well commented /etc/conf.d/net.
> >
> > What problems do you have specifically?
> > What did you try?
> > What was the expected outcome and what did you get in reality?
> 
> I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the
/etc/conf.d/net.example
> and
> added: dns_domain="STUDY"
> 
> but still .none comes up:
> 
> # domainname
> (none)
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Mick

[Timothy A. Holmes] 
I am not sure if this is related or not, but for some reason, my
resolv.conf keeps getting modified, causing samba to fail.  I open it
and all that is in there is the domain, no name servers.

If someone has a solution, please tell me -- my file server is now
offline 

Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list