public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: BRM <bm_witness@yahoo.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:34:23 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178414.37889.qm@web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B888D4F.2000500@gmail.com>

----- Original Message ----

> From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Neil Bothwick
> >> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:34:18 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
> >>> Aside from that, I'm not sure I have ever really run "emerge
> >>> --depclean", but I also rarely uninstall anything, but don't install
> >>> things left or right to try out either, so typically upgrades are all I
> >>> need to do.
> >>>        
> >> You should still run --depclean as dependencies change and you could still
> >> have plenty of no longer needed ones installed.
> >>      
> > Okay - so I ran "emerge --depclean -a" and got the below.
> > I tried running "emerge world -vuDNa" as specified, but that didn't resolve it 
> either.
> >
> > I tried looking in the world file (/var/lib/portage/world) but didn't find any 
> entries that felt safe to remove.
> > So, how do I resolve?
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> >   * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
> >   * the following required packages not being installed:
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 pulled in by:
> >   *     virtual/poppler-0.10.7
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   *   ~x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2 pulled in by:
> >   *     x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
> >   *
> >   * Have you forgotten to run `emerge --update --newuse --deep world` prior
> >   * to depclean? It may be necessary to manually uninstall packages that no 
> longer
> >   * exist in the portage tree since it may not be possible to satisfy their
> >   * dependencies.  Also, be aware of the --with-bdeps option that is 
> documented
> >   * in `man emerge`.
> >
> >    
> 
> I ran into this a long time ago and I added this to my make.conf so that 
> I don't forget.  Try running this:
> 
> emerge -uvDNa --with-bdeps y world
> 
> Then see what that does.  That added bit makes it look deeper into 
> dependencies. 

Okay, tried that. I did install 7 more packages (1 new, 6 rebuilds/updates).
But it didn't resolve the problem. I'm trying to determine if qt-4.4.2 is even installed.
Looking at /usr/lib there doesn't appear to be any qt-4.4.2 libs, only qt-4.5.3.

"qlist -Ia | grep x11-libs | grep qt"  only returns the following:
/usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.keep_x11-libs_qt-3
/etc/qt4/.keep_x11-libs_qt-core-4

Also, "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.4" didn't return anything, while "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.5 returned what I saw in /usr/lib/qt4.

So, then is x11-libs/qt-4.4.2 even installed? If not, how do I get rid of this?

TIA,

Ben

> Like you, I thought that was what the -D did but 
> apparently that only goes to a certain depth then stops.  If you want to 
> add that to make.conf like I did, this is what goes there:
> 
> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps y"
> 
> It's your choice whether to add that or not.  It will make emerge 
> process what needs to be updated a while longer tho.
> 
> Dale
> 
> :-)  :-)





  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-26  4:06 [gentoo-user] Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? BRM
2010-02-26  4:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-26  5:39   ` Dale
2010-02-26 14:34     ` BRM
2010-02-26 15:10       ` Alex Schuster
2010-02-26 16:10         ` BRM
2010-02-26 18:30           ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-26 18:01       ` Dale
2010-02-26 23:20       ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27  0:24         ` Dale
2010-02-27  2:15         ` BRM
2010-02-27  3:11           ` Dale
2010-02-27  4:34             ` BRM [this message]
2010-02-27  5:15               ` Dale
2010-02-27 11:38             ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27  3:19           ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27  3:45             ` Dale
2010-02-27  5:21               ` BRM
2010-02-27  6:53                 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27  7:21                   ` Mick
2010-02-27 11:39                   ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 11:41                 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 17:12                   ` Dale
2010-02-27 18:26                     ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 19:16                       ` Dale
2010-02-27 19:42                         ` BRM
2010-02-27 20:16                           ` Dale
2010-02-27 11:42               ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178414.37889.qm@web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com \
    --to=bm_witness@yahoo.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox