From: covici@ccs.covici.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl?
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:32:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17689.1412699521@ccs.covici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412696471.12590.0@numa-i>
Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> > On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
> >> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
> >> in the tree, yet, like
> >>
> >> [blocks B ] <perl-core/Socket-2.13.0 ("<perl-core/Socket-2.13.0"
> >> is blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
> >>
> >> Has anybody tried to upgrade to this version of Perl?
> >>
> >> Many thanks for some hints/comments,
> >> Helmut
> >
> > emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
> > emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
>
> These two worked just fine, BUT
>
> > perl-cleaner --all
>
> fails miserably showing many blocks mentioning versions which are not
> in the (unstable) tree
> like, e.g.
>
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.480.0 (and 28 more of those)
>
> Typically there is virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.0 which requires
> perl-core/File-Spec
> of the same version, but (here) there is only
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.400.0
>
> I wonder how all of you could get around this?
>
> Many thanks for your help,
I don't have perl-core/File-Spec installed, so I did not run into that
one. But I wonder if your tree is syncing properly or someting?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
covici@ccs.covici.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 8:13 [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl? Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 8:31 ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07 8:39 ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07 8:50 ` Tomas Mozes
2014-10-07 15:41 ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 15:55 ` Tomas Mozes
2014-10-07 16:07 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-10-07 16:19 ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 16:32 ` covici [this message]
2014-10-07 8:53 ` covici
2014-10-07 9:22 ` Alan McKinnon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17689.1412699521@ccs.covici.com \
--to=covici@ccs.covici.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox