public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: covici@ccs.covici.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl?
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:32:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17689.1412699521@ccs.covici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412696471.12590.0@numa-i>

Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:

> On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> > On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
> >> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
> >> in the tree, yet, like
> >> 
> >> [blocks B      ] <perl-core/Socket-2.13.0 ("<perl-core/Socket-2.13.0"
> >> is blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
> >> 
> >> Has anybody tried to upgrade to this version of Perl?
> >> 
> >> Many thanks for some hints/comments,
> >> Helmut
> > 
> > emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
> > emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
> 
> These two worked just fine, BUT
> 
> > perl-cleaner --all
> 
> fails miserably showing many blocks mentioning versions which are not  
> in the (unstable) tree
> like, e.g.
> 
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.480.0 (and 28 more of those)
> 
> Typically there is virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.0 which requires  
> perl-core/File-Spec
> of the same version, but (here) there is only  
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.400.0
> 
> I wonder how all of you could get around this?
> 
> Many thanks for your help,
I don't have perl-core/File-Spec installed, so I did not run into that
one.  But I wonder if your tree is syncing properly or someting?


-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         covici@ccs.covici.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07  8:13 [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl? Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07  8:31 ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07  8:39   ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07  8:50 ` Tomas Mozes
2014-10-07 15:41   ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 15:55     ` Tomas Mozes
2014-10-07 16:07     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-10-07 16:19       ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 16:32     ` covici [this message]
2014-10-07  8:53 ` covici
2014-10-07  9:22 ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17689.1412699521@ccs.covici.com \
    --to=covici@ccs.covici.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox