From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZfEi-0004QF-El for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:26:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4C731C03C; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260C1C03C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.143] (helo=smtp12.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZfBb-0006Sq-Lf for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:51 +0200 Received: from 5353c717.cm-6-4d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.83.199.23] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp12.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZfBY-00033A-N7 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:48 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EBA2921 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXonNlhS2Q0M for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F1C4BC for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Joost Roeleveld To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kdepim-4.6.0 woes Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:22:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1753528.vfYlfvXcaL@eve> User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3228639.SJ34fNAWLC@nazgul> References: <1370928.tS5hQM40xH@nazgul> <4E020DEB.8040405@gmail.com> <3228639.SJ34fNAWLC@nazgul> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QZfBY-00033A-N7 X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-0.928, vereist 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6bc320f2764191514ec49be2e5c9cd8e On Wednesday 22 June 2011 18:02:39 Alan McKinnon wrote: > But all this was mild compared to what I did yesterday. You know that > notice on the console when you get sudo wrong? It says the incident > "will be reported" > > OK. But to whom? On my shell boxes it gets reported to me. And > yesterday this is what it said: > > : Jun 21 11:55:25 : : 1 incorrect password attempt ; > TTY=pts/194 ; PWD=/some/path ; USER=root ; COMMAND=init 6 > > 500 concurrent sessions on that box is routine, it's a major gateway > server. That poor user has not recovered yet. You mean, he (or she) will eventually recover? Am curious though, why the attempt for a reboot? -- Joost