public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?
@ 2017-10-18 17:44 tuxic
  2017-10-18 20:12 ` Marc Joliet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: tuxic @ 2017-10-18 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo

Hi,

what is the better choice:
This one:
* media-gfx/cura
     Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"}
     Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura
     Description:         A 3D model slicing application for 3D printing

or
This one:
 * media-gfx/curaengine
     Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.6 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {doc test}
     Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine
     Description:         A 3D model slicing engine for 3D printing

Looks pretty identical to me...but I am no native speaker... ;)

Cheers
Meino




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?
  2017-10-18 17:44 [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ? tuxic
@ 2017-10-18 20:12 ` Marc Joliet
  2017-10-19 11:28   ` Zhu Sha Zang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Joliet @ 2017-10-18 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]

Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017, 19:44:33 CEST schrieb tuxic@posteo.de:
> Hi,
> 
> what is the better choice:
> This one:
> * media-gfx/cura
>      Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta
> (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5
> python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"}
> Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura
>      Description:         A 3D model slicing application for 3D printing
> 
														^^^^^^^^^^^
> or
> This one:
>  * media-gfx/curaengine
>      Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.6 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {doc
> test} Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine
>      Description:         A 3D model slicing engine for 3D printing
> 
														^^^^^^
> Looks pretty identical to me...but I am no native speaker... ;)

As I attempted to point out above, one is the engine and one is the 
application.  I suspect that installing cura will pull in curaengine as a 
dependency (addendum: looking at the ebuild verified this).

> Cheers
> Meino

HTH
-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?
  2017-10-18 20:12 ` Marc Joliet
@ 2017-10-19 11:28   ` Zhu Sha Zang
  2017-10-19 23:02     ` Marc Joliet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Sha Zang @ 2017-10-19 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

lol


On 10/18/2017 05:12 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017, 19:44:33 CEST schrieb tuxic@posteo.de:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what is the better choice:
>> This one:
>> * media-gfx/cura
>>       Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta
>> (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5
>> python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"}
>> Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura
>>       Description:         A 3D model slicing application for 3D printing
>>
> 														^^^^^^^^^^^
>> or
>> This one:
>>   * media-gfx/curaengine
>>       Available versions:  (~)0.15.04.6 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {doc
>> test} Homepage:            https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine
>>       Description:         A 3D model slicing engine for 3D printing
>>
> 														^^^^^^
>> Looks pretty identical to me...but I am no native speaker... ;)
> As I attempted to point out above, one is the engine and one is the
> application.  I suspect that installing cura will pull in curaengine as a
> dependency (addendum: looking at the ebuild verified this).
>
>> Cheers
>> Meino
> HTH



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?
  2017-10-19 11:28   ` Zhu Sha Zang
@ 2017-10-19 23:02     ` Marc Joliet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Joliet @ 2017-10-19 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 404 bytes --]

Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017, 13:28:57 CEST schrieb Zhu Sha Zang:
> lol

This is why you don't use tabs, people ;) .

(I didn't bother to comment on it because I thought the text description was 
enough, but yes, it does look ridiculous.  It looked fine in the draft, 
though.)

-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-19 23:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-18 17:44 [gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ? tuxic
2017-10-18 20:12 ` Marc Joliet
2017-10-19 11:28   ` Zhu Sha Zang
2017-10-19 23:02     ` Marc Joliet

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox