From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SCYED-0001Ea-AT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:22:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C993E086E; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d-out-001.smtp25.com (unknown [67.228.158.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C256E0881 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (pool-96-247-198-116.clppva.fios.verizon.net [96.247.198.116]) by d-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q2RFKlqw006150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:20:48 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2RFKi90016632 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:20:47 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought In-reply-to: <20120327150450.26e860fa@hactar.digimed.co.uk> References: <1332844604.4130.0@numa-i> <4F71BE44.3080206@kutulu.org> <20120327150450.26e860fa@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Comments: In-reply-to Neil Bothwick message dated "Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:04:50 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.2 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:20:44 -0400 Message-ID: <16631.1332861644@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 96.247.198.116 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-q2RFKlqw006150 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: c8a4010b-f4a5-4bae-a1e9-b9c7179ef060 X-Archives-Hash: 7844ed15a23f76d997467c7b792034b7 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:30:41 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > > > If we're going to be shoved into tight space like this, I'd be nice if > > the "you can just use $x" tools work on stable. I've got three > > previously-working systems at home I can't risk rebooting right now > > because of this udev+/usr nonsense. I almost invariably put /usr and > > /home on top of LVM, RAID or both. > > Only the testing udev needs an initramfs now, so it doesn't really matter > yet. However, it would be nice if dracut were stabilised at least a week > before udev-18* to give time to play with it. It certainly needs to be > stabilised before the news announcement of udev-18* going stable. > With the latest genkernel, my initrd mounts /usr, however the fsck is never done because its mounted -- any solution for this? -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com