From: Felix Leif Keppmann <felix.leif@keppmann.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] heads-up: 2011-05-01 baselayout news
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 21:00:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1660147.JTpHilh7Lx@fekepp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimt1i3RK1JaxPKB2sJd7aMC75t1nw@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Mark,
the news item does not tell the exact version because there might be sub/rc-
versions until release. so on release date the devs will remove keywords of
the right versions. i read the dev mailing list a bit and it should be
baselayout-2.0.2 + openrc-0.8.2-r1
if no further -rc will be introduced till release. already installed it
yesterday, followed the migration guide and it works fine for me.
or just wait until it is offical released and use those versions.
Cheers
Felix Leif
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:01 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
> >> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up. :)
> >
> > It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable.
> > I'll be unmasking and updating a couple of boxen today, taking
> > advantage of some spare time and finishing the rest off next weekend.
> >
> > Hope all goes well.
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Mick
>
> How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask? The news
> message seems quite vague and I see lots of versions of things. Two
> 2.X versions of baselayout and four versions of OpenRC.
>
> I'd potentially start updating a stable machine today but I'd prefer
> to only unmask what is actually going to become the stable version and
> nothing higher.
>
> - Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 9:03 [gentoo-user] heads-up: 2011-05-01 baselayout news Thanasis
2011-05-02 9:11 ` Thanasis
2011-05-02 9:31 ` Mick
2011-05-02 17:11 ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-02 17:36 ` Mick
2011-05-02 17:55 ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-03 2:23 ` William Hubbs
2011-05-02 18:02 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-05-02 18:16 ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-02 18:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-05-02 18:54 ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-02 22:07 ` Mark Knecht
2011-05-03 5:07 ` Mick
2011-05-02 19:00 ` Felix Leif Keppmann [this message]
2011-05-02 10:18 ` Dale
2011-05-02 9:43 ` Mick
2011-05-02 10:05 ` Mick
2011-05-02 10:26 ` Thanasis
2011-05-02 10:50 ` Mick
2011-05-02 11:25 ` Thanasis
2011-05-02 11:52 ` Alex Schuster
2011-05-02 12:35 ` Mick
2011-05-05 8:25 ` Alex Schuster
2011-05-05 9:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-05-05 19:57 ` Mick
2011-05-02 10:06 ` Thanasis
2011-05-03 0:16 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1660147.JTpHilh7Lx@fekepp-laptop \
--to=felix.leif@keppmann.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox