From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HeARq-0002Pw-IR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:43:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3IDfwjW011592; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:41:58 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3IDaKoK004513 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:36:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701CE64D4A for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:36:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.367 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.367 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.367] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFDMQdnL1hCS for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25B064FA5 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HeAKC-0006Sn-Nb for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:56 +0200 Received: from zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch ([212.55.215.153]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:56 +0200 Received: from listen by zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Alexander Skwar Subject: [gentoo-user] FUSE (was: Add a module post kernel config/build) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:35:49 +0200 Organization: n/a Message-ID: <1609263.41bEaePWJD@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <873b2y59i7.fsf@newsguy.com> <2325869.f2q9DNFP8c@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <20070418135051.3d23b2a7@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 7909a5e5-d95d-41fa-86b0-5021b79f466d X-Archives-Hash: 45a3bd6a2d13e82986b2717aade71033 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:37:07 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> As far FUSE is concerned, it might be advisable to stay away from the >> in-kernel FUSE and use the standalone sys-fs/fuse package. At >> least ntfs3g doesn't work with the in-kernel fuse. > > Really? It works here, as do sshfs and encfs. Hm. Not so sure anymore. I seem to remember, that either sys-fs/ntfs3g or sys-fs/fuse would completely refuse to build, if in-kernel fuse was built. But checking out the ebuilds on the CVS, I can't seem to be able to back this statement I made. While we're at the topic of fuse - which version is more recent? The one in gentoo kernel or the one in the seperate package? Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list