From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ga51y-0001nx-GI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:35:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9I6Xncd032640; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:33:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9I6VlFM012551 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:31:48 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786FE64863 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:31:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCmiNuIGEnxg for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFD964748 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ga4xZ-00081q-O8 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:26 +0200 Received: from new.email-server.info ([213.133.109.44]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:25 +0200 Received: from listen by new.email-server.info with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Alexander Skwar Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: <15910968.RmOYfFVDSC@work.message-center.info> References: <20061018033704.56943.qmail@web31713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20061018034357.48707.qmail@web31708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1798094.hGOHUqiLf3@m-id.message-center.info> <200610172253.27152.bulliver@badcomputer.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: new.email-server.info User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k9I6Xnd7032640 X-Archives-Salt: 11aea678-7c5e-43cb-898e-1117ea82f51e X-Archives-Hash: 0716891f2a0433df827c0b931199b6d9 Darren Kirby : > Quoth the Alexander Skwar >> =C2=B7 maxim wexler : >> >>digg2ogg >> > >> > should be dir2ogg >> >> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different >> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? >=20 > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different = (ie:=20 > newer) version offered. Good enough?=20 No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is, what's in the tree. And the latest stable version is 0.8, no matter what you think. The question remains: Why should a different version be offere= d? Alexander Skwar --=20 A closed mouth gathers no foot. --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list