From: Alexander Skwar <listen@alexander.skwar.name>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15910968.RmOYfFVDSC@work.message-center.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200610172253.27152.bulliver@badcomputer.org
Darren Kirby <bulliver@badcomputer.org>:
> Quoth the Alexander Skwar
>> · maxim wexler <blissfix@yahoo.com>:
>> >>digg2ogg
>> >
>> > should be dir2ogg
>>
>> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different
>> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"?
>
> Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie:
> newer) version offered. Good enough?
No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is,
what's in the tree. And the latest stable version is 0.8, no matter what
you think. The question remains: Why should a different version be offered?
Alexander Skwar
--
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-18 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 3:37 [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync? maxim wexler
2006-10-18 3:43 ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18 5:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 5:53 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 6:11 ` Iain Buchanan
2006-10-18 6:31 ` Alexander Skwar [this message]
2006-10-18 18:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 18:57 ` Willie Wong
2006-10-18 19:20 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 21:31 ` Alexander Skwar
[not found] ` <200610181449.12060.bulliver@badcomputer.org>
2006-10-19 10:04 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-19 14:38 ` Devon Miller
2006-10-19 14:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-19 17:21 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: " Willie Wong
2006-10-19 19:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Darren Kirby
[not found] ` <200610191217.17509.bulliver@badcomputer.org>
2006-10-19 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Justin Findlay
2006-10-18 21:27 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 7:56 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2006-10-18 18:23 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 3:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18 3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18 3:56 ` Drew
2006-10-18 4:00 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:02 ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18 21:35 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19 0:06 ` maxim wexler
2006-10-19 10:09 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-19 18:23 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19 20:49 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:49 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:50 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-10-19 0:21 ` b.n.
2006-10-18 5:29 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 8:01 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15910968.RmOYfFVDSC@work.message-center.info \
--to=listen@alexander.skwar.name \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox