From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qt3aV-000661-Nz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:16:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C5A21C347; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D24621C33A for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf25 with SMTP id 25so4546869wwf.10 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=1bj5izzCuqAG+4VoCCkLdzxxuzEpWZYrP5Ardd2q9I0=; b=IvCVEP5zEliiojJJX8kwqAo3wzc+4gwhKI95OeLXmQR7spIflNlVtxOi1NrSxoYZak H/7W8uwuGkbkUPeddLF156mCu381GOK7nINA9ZyueZp6LZ9USZQ+SHdSB9FrrPMz6x7l jYEr/1vU14GEpzGd1ig3i3jv1ngQ2JgKUvifk= Received: by 10.227.55.17 with SMTP id s17mr3711401wbg.57.1313439307634; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-153-55.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.153.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id et16sm4824083wbb.53.2011.08.15.13.15.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:15:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:14:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1572382.X1TkjcIXpu@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck-r2; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4E497D99.4020404@gmail.com> References: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> <2353720.0zyCrGIGVy@nazgul> <4E497D99.4020404@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c7fd79b6fccd7cebfe60ccc5d1fffdcc On Mon 15 August 2011 15:12:09 Dale did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Do you have autounmask enabled or disabled in your config for > > portage? > > > > That first example you gave strongly indicates you have it > > enabled. > I'm thinking the same thing. It seems to be enabled by default I > think. I know it is here and I didn't do it. It just sort of > appeared one day. I *think* I even asked on here about it. You did, and I remember it clearly. I even looked at my own setup and concluded that a recent portage update enabled it by default. I never had any issues with it as I run unstable so there's nothing to unmask except my -9999 packages which are all unamsked ** already. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com