From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140669-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0FA1381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:51:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F4C521C00E;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657EFE0783
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so1785215bkw.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
        bh=yVnMjRDyqy1FCFh3EmF1RSFCR5+md49i/vtrTxTkmPE=;
        b=X5jt+g8NNzRWI9+wNO/SxeFiCczfXoC/P6WvGGDobuc6muWBH9UOdyIU70oYoPz00m
         wOHea8NCLUw40hwSHYAA6jfDJxnH5exHCFOQbdH3Fh0MtVxaA6KAThT4zzAcJYDXlFCK
         Oogq+wiJa5/V8iWN5HKZiWISwIwwn0AouEWiOqnVseYnX3omgDjXL8byMvoRWK250b6+
         8aEPuM/TPXDLpj1nNxc29tka1aUCQbAfU5QBLJxSwLP1vjg0FqXFdtnVIFXh4lR0UF15
         tIQ7AjOsuBRIf9+3XLEwt45CVCDbys8nNCqrt+NIlK9cdAlC07s1OxWx+gBzbGDx5Im2
         SgKQ==
Received: by 10.205.136.3 with SMTP id ii3mr2541501bkc.101.1345243764394;
        Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from energy.localnet (p4FC6090F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.9.15])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg13sm4073449bkc.7.2012.08.17.15.49.19
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] common flags for 2 cpu?
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:49:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1547910.r3dKUXC6eX@energy>
User-Agent: KMail/4.9 (Linux/3.2.27; KDE/4.9.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAKpSnpJQ7h87pWj_zoewUeO96iDcruKkKNBmSO_po9A=j0H8kg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKpSnp+g2YD2MYbDKnGzLH1nSn3J3_ykPrHA7aXXvRotvjrM1w@mail.gmail.com> <502EB22B.7000304@binarywings.net> <CAKpSnpJQ7h87pWj_zoewUeO96iDcruKkKNBmSO_po9A=j0H8kg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt: 77903bce-277e-4d26-a5b7-94e01ddf5800
X-Archives-Hash: bfa9d26dd72d513cb6108ed732dff17e

Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 22:34:45 schrieb Jorge Almeida:
> Does -march=prescott not ensure that the prescott will work even if
> unsupported flags are added?

no

every flag on its own. If you set a flag it is your responsibility to check that 
they actually work.

-- 
#163933