From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-136527-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S9G6l-000606-R9
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:25:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C2EEE0AFE;
	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E702E0B45
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:23:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oxusltgw07.schlund.de (oxusltgw07.lxa.perfora.net [172.19.206.9])
	by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0Lw2OD-1SN4Q50ws1-018BoU; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:23:00 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Bruce Hill, Jr." <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <1524417820.813016.1332076980185.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com>
In-Reply-To: <1586556.ch0IsWVTR9@localhost>
References: <709768995.843751.1331957483491.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> <CA+czFiA9qF6u7wx0FtpzdTa=K=Q+bhnd48nPhzobPqSDb2FOxw@mail.gmail.com> <2122885020.812221.1332072119155.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> <1586556.ch0IsWVTR9@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The End Is Near ... or, get the vaseline, they're
 on the way!
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v6.20.0-Rev36
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:9iYbsF6/6AAi9Ew5mtKsSJSXJNlH2SPiJ9GC4+aAiqG
 vMxJV7tmdXk9KfGbBkMfzB4Mew3db86DPN9u2L+Mp5tSP//qaT
 myB6Ov4a2d6GK8UcNOw7dl1AfOXycp1sqNbf9NelF6JntisMnF
 /iWbT2giIxQAYjkfqGGRyzRlrgpBvUN4FRKDZQcwfYtL/YD2Zp
 AR0oLrb5nO3evX43iY6NSWGpmtJsAkYePIguH241vaQ3zdJ5cU
 dpG0+dvd2kct9bH3+rkOYEqj9+Tc22YCtBMHx9hmT6gcEsM1Y9
 0vXRyVoBq108cNCL+KEK+r790ZvUFZQwNWa1+NRceoqq4zCT/R
 zgqQCrud38Z6bIo4c7ke0hztXse2vl2EbzhIrLmMbIFKZtSZ54
 5cXk7aN3m570nTwrN39CEpbCBMINuNVNcp8LkOGgqq0E/+Sfsq
 wHjBy
X-Archives-Salt: 744f6c9e-c396-4381-a71a-a140830128c2
X-Archives-Hash: 67d13431a5e467241dd178b0a4cfc1e5




On March 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM Volker Armin Hemmann
<volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Am Sonntag, 18. M=C3=A4rz 2012, 08:01:59 schrieb Bruce Hill, Jr.:
> > On March 18, 2012 at 3:54 AM Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I recall reading on this list a week or two ago that kernel
> > > >> autoassembly of 0.90 arrays was deprecated. :(
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> :wq
> > > >
> > > > Works on my computers.
> > >
> > > And mine. But 'deprecated' means 'this may go away in the future'.
> >
> > My question ... who says it's deprecated and why?
>
> the kernel devs because the kernel might get it wrong and for some reason
they
> think that this is worse then mdadm getting it wrong. Which is of course
> bullshit because either way you are f*cked.

It works better in kernel than userspace presently, and doesn't require a
nasty initrd image, so I'm sticking with that.

Might you post from LKML where said "kernel devs" deprecated kernel
assembly of RAID us 0.90 metadata?
--

Happy Penguin Computers    >`)
126 Fenco Drive            ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801            ^^
662-269-2706; 662-491-8613
support at happypenguincomputers dot com
http://www.happypenguincomputers.com