From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S9G6l-000606-R9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:25:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C2EEE0AFE; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E702E0B45 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oxusltgw07.schlund.de (oxusltgw07.lxa.perfora.net [172.19.206.9]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lw2OD-1SN4Q50ws1-018BoU; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:23:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:23:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bruce Hill, Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <1524417820.813016.1332076980185.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> In-Reply-To: <1586556.ch0IsWVTR9@localhost> References: <709768995.843751.1331957483491.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> <2122885020.812221.1332072119155.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1and1.com> <1586556.ch0IsWVTR9@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The End Is Near ... or, get the vaseline, they're on the way! Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Medium X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v6.20.0-Rev36 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:9iYbsF6/6AAi9Ew5mtKsSJSXJNlH2SPiJ9GC4+aAiqG vMxJV7tmdXk9KfGbBkMfzB4Mew3db86DPN9u2L+Mp5tSP//qaT myB6Ov4a2d6GK8UcNOw7dl1AfOXycp1sqNbf9NelF6JntisMnF /iWbT2giIxQAYjkfqGGRyzRlrgpBvUN4FRKDZQcwfYtL/YD2Zp AR0oLrb5nO3evX43iY6NSWGpmtJsAkYePIguH241vaQ3zdJ5cU dpG0+dvd2kct9bH3+rkOYEqj9+Tc22YCtBMHx9hmT6gcEsM1Y9 0vXRyVoBq108cNCL+KEK+r790ZvUFZQwNWa1+NRceoqq4zCT/R zgqQCrud38Z6bIo4c7ke0hztXse2vl2EbzhIrLmMbIFKZtSZ54 5cXk7aN3m570nTwrN39CEpbCBMINuNVNcp8LkOGgqq0E/+Sfsq wHjBy X-Archives-Salt: 744f6c9e-c396-4381-a71a-a140830128c2 X-Archives-Hash: 67d13431a5e467241dd178b0a4cfc1e5 On March 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Sonntag, 18. M=C3=A4rz 2012, 08:01:59 schrieb Bruce Hill, Jr.: > > On March 18, 2012 at 3:54 AM Michael Mol wrote: > > > >> I recall reading on this list a week or two ago that kernel > > > >> autoassembly of 0.90 arrays was deprecated. :( > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> :wq > > > > > > > > Works on my computers. > > > > > > And mine. But 'deprecated' means 'this may go away in the future'. > > > > My question ... who says it's deprecated and why? > > the kernel devs because the kernel might get it wrong and for some reason they > think that this is worse then mdadm getting it wrong. Which is of course > bullshit because either way you are f*cked. It works better in kernel than userspace presently, and doesn't require a nasty initrd image, so I'm sticking with that. Might you post from LKML where said "kernel devs" deprecated kernel assembly of RAID us 0.90 metadata? -- Happy Penguin Computers >`) 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ 662-269-2706; 662-491-8613 support at happypenguincomputers dot com http://www.happypenguincomputers.com