From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFX3a-0003HQ-FQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A04B6E07CE; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB7FE06ED for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B496559D for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:53:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.863 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.863 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.736, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLKvX87zSasr for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0A865565 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFX2q-0001c5-42 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:44 +0000 Received: from 84-72-87-192.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.87.192]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:44 +0000 Received: from michael.schmarck by 84-72-87-192.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:52:44 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Schmarck Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Once again baffled by portage Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:52:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1523606.tFevDmHxuV@michael-schmarck.my-fqdn.de> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84-72-87-192.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 6e8cb618-8ae2-4013-8691-67234a87c8a4 X-Archives-Hash: 2eca9b37aec5dba98a7c40bd3410463e =C2=B7 Grant Edwards : > Why won't portage let me install kompare? Because you already have it. > # emerge --pretend kompare > =20 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > =20 > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] kde-base/kompare-3.5.7 USE=3D"arts -debug -kdeenabl= efinal -kdehiddenvisibility -xinerama"=20 > [blocks B ] =3Dkde-base/kompare-3.5* (is blocking kde-base/kdesd= k-3.5.7) > [blocks B ] =3Dkde-base/kdesdk-3.5* (is blocking kde-base/kompar= e-3.5.7) > =20 > How does one figure out where these "blocks" are coming from? By having a look in the ebuilds. > There are no other versions of kompare installed. > kde-base/kdesdk-3.5.7 _is_ installed. There is no mention of > kde in /etc/portage/*. I suppose kompare is part of kdesdk. kdesdk is a huge package containing lots of stuff. So I suppose you cannot have both kdesdk and a broken out package (kompare) installed at the same time. > * kde-base/kdesdk > Latest version available: 3.5.7 > Latest version installed: 3.5.7 > Size of files: 5,088 kB > Homepage: http://www.kde.org/ > Description: KDE SDK: Cervisia, KBabel, KCachegrind, Kompare= , Umbrello,... > License: GPL-2 Yep. There it says: kdesdk also offers Kompare. Hm, why would you want to install Kompare, if you already have it installed?=20 Michael Schmarck --=20 Why would anyone want to be called "Later"? --=20 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list