public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schmarck <michael.schmarck@habmalnefrage.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user]  Re: Once again baffled by portage
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:52:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523606.tFevDmHxuV@michael-schmarck.my-fqdn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fmns6o$63d$1@ger.gmane.org

· Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>:

> Why won't portage let me install kompare?

Because you already have it.

>    # emerge --pretend kompare
>    
>    These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>    
>    Calculating dependencies... done!
>    [ebuild  N    ] kde-base/kompare-3.5.7  USE="arts -debug -kdeenablefinal -kdehiddenvisibility -xinerama" 
>    [blocks B     ] =kde-base/kompare-3.5* (is blocking kde-base/kdesdk-3.5.7)
>    [blocks B     ] =kde-base/kdesdk-3.5* (is blocking kde-base/kompare-3.5.7)
>    
> How does one figure out where these "blocks" are coming from?

By having a look in the ebuilds.

> There are no other versions of kompare installed.
> kde-base/kdesdk-3.5.7 _is_ installed.  There is no mention of
> kde<anything> in /etc/portage/*.

I suppose kompare is part of kdesdk. kdesdk is a huge package containing
lots of stuff. So I suppose you cannot have both kdesdk and a broken
out package (kompare) installed at the same time.

>    *  kde-base/kdesdk
>          Latest version available: 3.5.7
>          Latest version installed: 3.5.7
>          Size of files: 5,088 kB
>          Homepage:      http://www.kde.org/
>          Description:   KDE SDK: Cervisia, KBabel, KCachegrind, Kompare, Umbrello,...
>          License:       GPL-2

Yep. There it says: kdesdk also offers Kompare.

Hm, why would you want to install Kompare, if you already have it
installed? 

Michael Schmarck
-- 
Why would anyone want to be called "Later"?


-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-17 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-17 15:28 [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage Grant Edwards
2008-01-17 15:52 ` Michael Schmarck [this message]
2008-01-17 16:00 ` [gentoo-user] " Guilherme Amadio
2008-01-17 16:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2008-01-17 19:47   ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2008-01-17 20:20     ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-17 23:41   ` [gentoo-user] " Bo Ørsted Andresen
2008-01-18  0:08     ` Neil Bothwick
2008-01-18  0:17       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2008-01-18  1:04         ` Neil Bothwick
2008-01-18 14:36     ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-19 15:01       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2008-01-17 19:50 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1523606.tFevDmHxuV@michael-schmarck.my-fqdn.de \
    --to=michael.schmarck@habmalnefrage.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox