public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] net-wireless/blueman-2.1_alpha2 blocked by net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth - is it necessary?
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:08:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512828491.3369.4.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2626282.TuXHzJEg2m@note>

On R, 2017-12-08 at 19:39 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> > 
> > Is it really necessary to block one package when another installed?
> 
> Most of the time, the reason to make packages to block each other is 
> collisions (if they they contain files (like binaries or libraries)
> with same 
> install paths).
> 
> Although, I can't guarantee that it was the case here.

There was a blocker in blueman against gnome-bluetooth due to a file
collision with gnome-bluetooth. This was removed with 2.0-r1, back in
Oct 2015, as blueman upstream solved it.
To me it looks like the change didn't make it to the live ebuild and
then eventually sometime after 2.0.3 a bump was made via copying from
9999, not the latest version, thus reinstating the blocker, possibly by
accident. Or maybe on purpose, but I don't see an explanation for it in
logs.
Try to remove the blocker in blueman, see if files collide or not, and
if not file a bug against blueman, possibly with info that it might
have been accidental reintroduction due to..., etc.

> I've noticed that Gnome Team makes some decisions, that doesn't looks
> logical 
> for a few times already.

Something not looking logical for you doesn't mean there isn't sound
logic. In this case, it's not us who have a blocker possibly wrongly
reintroduced here.


Best,
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo GNOME team lead


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-09 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08 12:27 [gentoo-user] net-wireless/blueman-2.1_alpha2 blocked by net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth - is it necessary? Alexey Eschenko
2017-12-08 12:39 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2017-12-08 13:22   ` Alexey Eschenko
2017-12-08 16:37     ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-09  0:47       ` Alexey Eschenko
2017-12-09  8:44         ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-09 14:08   ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2017-12-10 23:14     ` Alexey Eschenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1512828491.3369.4.camel@gentoo.org \
    --to=leio@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox