From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZrAd-0000jC-2j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:10:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41B4F1C062; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD841C062 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2036457wwf.10 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:07:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=Gm5mbHGMH/vN89zgqMKDW1E6sgn9AHdxNyn37eWg2/M=; b=iza/4cdmkZvpANFEyyguwM4L2UBwl2v5ko4TG952yzS+01T0mhIlHnoTmEnHWFRUcy H0YZt+kLEpIDaQMU3UHrK7zyVyDctLIG9n6ZxU8VaLm6c75PyzVWkk3ryeE1j/rFOF38 4RmG6fGH74s3urj+czJ4L4BZV0FZFR1Zu8Qws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=X7zyS6mUM58xH8wRCFc452QLa3Crn3xRgn2ZnSxrmfxVXPFdHfR3IH4sDrLMFqWmwP eeDJeZdjS97HRtsBJuJLJ4/Kb+P+CgKbCrvo4oqWslqS4VbCPG3yiIScufj/qJiqdlJQ Qa0UwLZ9rv31w0ddyMWmPxdNMwacvxt0zNA/w= Received: by 10.216.232.4 with SMTP id m4mr2420358weq.87.1308863256717; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f60sm1067470wef.37.2011.06.23.14.07.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:07:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:06:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1495169.845KSzWzGS@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110623213521.3b19adc3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> References: <3788690.KUE4u0ROPA@nazgul> <20110623213521.3b19adc3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 43c73456f56bce83dbe3d7739fcac26d On Thursday 23 June 2011 21:35:21 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:45:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > If you consider spending a couple of days farting around > > > with > > > fortran to be "much easier"... :P > > > > I use sets for this. I want KDE but not all of it, so I have a > > set > > > with just the -meta packages I want: > I do similar, except I'm even more of a control freak than you, so > my kde4 set contains onl;y a couple of meta-packages, the rest it > individual packages. > > % wc -l /etc/portage/sets/kde4 > 83 /etc/portage/sets/kde4 > > Sad, I know :( Wow, how do you maintain that lot and keep it all straight? KDE devs love adding and removing and renaming stuff between minor versions, mostly just for the hell of it. You could end up with KDE-4.2 packages in there if you don't keep an eye on it :-) -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com