From: Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:35:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474337.CKuYS0Cz6D@pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPrc80ky59iwkW8PAdjL+B0WYrQF8GP-z9_411i1ijoEQd7ig@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Canek,
On Saturday, 15. October 2011 00:50:22 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>>>> A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on /
> >>>>> again. :-P>>>>
> >>>> Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it...
> >>>
> >>> Dang, I was only a year old when hal came out? That just doubled my
> >>> age. It's closer to what I feel like tho.
> >>>
> >>> I'm still not happy with /usr being required tho. That is still
> >>> standing on a bad nerve. Don't worry tho, I got plenty of those
> >>> bad nerves. :-P>>
> >> Do you know that there's a plan to move /var/run to / also? ;-)
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >>
> >> Now someone on here swears up and down that /var isn't going to be
> >> required on /.
> >
> > /var != /var/run
> > /var != /var/lock
> >
> > /var/run is going in /run, but /var/run (by definition) only contains
> > things like PID files and runtime sockets. In the same vein, /var/lock
> > also is going into /run/lock. I have acknowledged this from the very
> > beginning, and I have been pointing out that implying that because
> > those two (really small and bounded) directories of /var are going
> > into /run and /run/lock, it doesn't mean that the whole /var will go
> > into /. That is disinformation.
>
> I finally found the link (got confused by gmane interface):
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/246892
>
> Quoting myself (from more than one month ago):
>
> "Saying that proposing /run and /lock to be available at boot time
> means that in the future a separated /var partition could be not
> supported is, in my book, disinformation. /var/run and /var/lock (by
> definition) are almost empty (in space). /var/lib usually stores whole
> databases. The difference is important and relevant."
and you still did not look into /var/lib to see, what is actually in there?
My systems has directories alsa, bluetooth, hp and many more there that are
not databases at all.
Stop spreading this misinformation, please.
> Regards.
Best,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-15 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 15:43 [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional Lavender
2011-10-14 15:52 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-14 16:15 ` Dale
2011-10-14 21:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-14 22:47 ` Dale
2011-10-15 5:10 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-10-15 6:56 ` Dale
2011-10-15 7:09 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-10-15 7:34 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 7:50 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 8:35 ` Michael Schreckenbauer [this message]
2011-10-15 8:42 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 8:53 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:11 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:31 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:47 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 10:05 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 10:34 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 10:45 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 11:04 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 19:23 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 10:49 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 18:57 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-10-15 23:25 ` Mike Edenfield
2011-10-15 8:37 ` Dale
2011-10-15 9:02 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:15 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:21 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:32 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 9:49 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 9:37 ` Dale
2011-10-15 9:54 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 17:23 ` Dale
2011-10-15 14:23 ` pk
2011-10-15 16:46 ` Claudio Roberto França Pereira
2011-10-15 19:20 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-15 21:15 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 9:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 10:10 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-15 11:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-10-15 12:19 ` Jonas de Buhr
2011-10-15 13:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-10-15 13:48 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-10-15 18:43 ` Joost Roeleveld
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-14 16:05 [gentoo-user] 回复: " Lavender
2011-10-17 12:45 ` du yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474337.CKuYS0Cz6D@pc \
--to=grimlog@gmx.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox