From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D6F13838B for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50456E09D0; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.164]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254A4E0977 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.134] (helo=smtp3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xduzo-0006rJ-FN for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:50:08 +0200 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp3.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xduzn-0005Fw-Us for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:50:08 +0200 Received: from andromeda.localnet (unknown [213.19.196.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BAC04B for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:49:48 +0200 (CEST) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:50:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1447060.2JSFZMphQx@andromeda> Organization: Antarean User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <543601E5.9020904@gmail.com> References: <38184589.CJmMyhdXyd@andromeda> <543601E5.9020904@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: 6024168b-22f2-43e1-b91b-22f8ac31c471 X-Archives-Hash: f98c9dbf679835a8d7cdd845ecf3a9ca On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 08:32:53 PM Daniel Frey wrote: > On 10/07/2014 09:42 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Are you talking about the behaviour when you actually click on the > > foldername, instead of the " > " ? > > > > If yes, then that is as designed. > > No, I'm clicking on the " > ". Sometimes I've expanded folders three to > four levels deep and so it selects completely unrelated folders and > files, as it selects everything from where I've clicked to the top of > the list. > > It's really annoying, do you know if that "feature" be turned off? > > Dan What do you mean with "select" Do all the entries become selected (marked) ready for delete/copy/...? I have seen this behaviour in a lot of different programs (also on MS Windows). Usually caused by some key-combination which is accidentally pressed and forces the shift-key to be "locked". -- Joost