From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZpq5-0000vs-Ej for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:45:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 217331C0FA; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39CE1C0FA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so2008493wyb.40 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=RLRWK28lrjd+SGC2xJ4K5MfgxCjrbax1VwnMeGoBN0o=; b=gtDCaILGy8TcMa/QzbNQ5PzF5swIwEMk7JjHgqXwgBAza2+96hhAxUOu2n/uVcJgR1 PK7hfuycsFylqBKYRZn5wXXz5Hd+zNsEKXk2yZCx3Jgkj2nsgiJbsjYMLT21R8QX5I8z e1cTYQiwVIN2oLLG4w4RcPMBTXv4Da05le4MQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=b3oMFN1noFxiwZ+tLKUaxl21RfoAfe/Lm+JPJdAT0A+1aCqz1pN0iMs9yv8TPU+Dqv 5HTPsofSezIgNe+DqOsFMv9AM33U8M8yUPQEHiaIkqzFbkWLBah1ByE2KhnyNGoNy/v9 54+48i0awOwwe2pBap7oS+xRt8sAqjjMNcYRg= Received: by 10.227.197.83 with SMTP id ej19mr2244797wbb.105.1308858109199; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ei4sm1471605wbb.9.2011.06.23.12.41.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:41:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Daniel Pielmeier Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: <1444116.ka3gdOcJZy@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <4E02189A.90908@darkmetatron.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f7c9f2220c497ae0b791ca842f8c7bbe On Thursday 23 June 2011 13:31:10 Daniel Pielmeier did opine thusly: > 2011/6/22 Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler : > > Am 22.06.2011 17:31, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > >> On Wednesday 22 June 2011 15:44:40 Neil Bothwick did opine=20 thusly: > >>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:41:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>>> It is unset here (well, it's not set, actually - same > >>>> thing) > >>>=20 > >>> autounmask is set by default, you need to explicitly set it > >>> to off. > >>=20 > >> So, > >>=20 > >> is it invisibly on then? I don't have it in make.conf and it's > >> not in > >=20 > >> FEATURES: > > It is not a FEATURE its a default option > >=20 > > NOTE: This --autounmask behavior can be disabled by setting > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--autounmask=3Dn" in make.conf. >=20 > Sorry for the confusion by mixing up FEATURES with > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS. I did not have a Gentoo machine at hand when > writing this. No worries, I had also assumed it was a FEATURE.=20 I'd read about it in Changelogs long before you posted but paid little=20= attention - it's something I wouldn't use, so could ignore it. --=20 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com