From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QjgGw-0005rN-Lg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:33:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF1B421C22B; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D6521C069 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so2414712fxd.11 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=/5qCjULPq/qQGPGTnWjCdbN+fF3T5W2nwTCdb9D+1no=; b=A6O305mF+8gho5qgXCLpxqnjeSJ2a+/vaI4AL1eAMmyRLI7U6+kHFiAmbyTOz/Ate+ sksaBvIeVKLX77Zd9MQSKYjLRDFIDPnK7lKiu5jan9vPhczN6/hZRxUlPmixmRZacRkE EYfQuIKGXRT0Wwl+nPU33DumTxOvJJxoP5wZ0= Received: by 10.223.72.80 with SMTP id l16mr1173256faj.33.1311204755327; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC7425F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.66.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm1004855fak.42.2011.07.20.16.32.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't find reiser4 patch for kernel-2.6.39 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:32:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1444079.z26IIleh44@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.7 rc2 (Linux/2.6.39.3; KDE/4.6.95; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201107181218.58650.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <1477701.Xv56x05geN@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: eada0d344400c33925470c022915c06a On Wednesday 20 July 2011 15:20:43 Stroller wrote: > On 19 July 2011, at 15:43, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >>> =E2=80=A6 > >>> But we should put up with you trolling around and then acting all= > >>> insulted and whiney when told to stop it? > >>=20 > >> Unless there is some family or intimate connection the rest of us = are > >> unaware of, there are no grounds for you to be offended on behalf = of a > >> convicted murderer. > >=20 > > I am not offended because of a murderer. I am offended by your weak= > > trolling. Somebody asks some raiser4 related questions and little > > trolls like you pop up and spout their crap. All the fucking time. >=20 > Ok, maybe I should just excuse you for your disability. It's clear yo= u're > not properly calibrated to social interactions. oh sure, because I have called you for your trolling, I am unable to in= teract.=20 You know me really well. Wow, thanks for your distant-analyzation of my= mind.=20 You must be a genius. >=20 > The whole point of "trolling" is that it *is* an attempt to offend or= > disturb. So if you have no reason to be offended or disturbed, then m= y joke > couldn't possibly have been trolling. You offended and you disturbed. Instead of an answer you sent a tastele= ss=20 joke. Which is a disturbance. Follwing your own sentence above that is=20= trolling. Really, try better. > >> You had to use the word "idiotic", apparently because it makes you= > >> feel big, like in your head you have more stature, when you slap > >> someone else down.>=20 > > no, I used it because your 'joke' was idiotic. Beware: I did not ca= ll > > yourself an idiot. A suble difference you should have thought about= . >=20 > Are you trying to backpedal now? no. I stand by my word. Your 'joke' was bad trolling and idiotic. > Because anyone can see that idiocy is > inherently associated with idiots, and you're likely to antagonise pe= ople > just the same whichever way you phrase it. I really do not care about your esteem for me. Or what anybody else on = this=20 list think about me. If you were among my 'real life' friends - yeah, I would care. But some= =20 anonymous troll on a mailing list? Seriously, you aren't even man enoug= h to=20 post using your name - and I shall regard your person highly? > > I am sick of people who troll around and then go all whiney when pu= t > > down. You can either handle the flames or you restrain yourself. It= > > seems that you > You're really not worth the time. because you got burnt it seems. -- #163933