public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] .tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:17:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14357815.ppYdG0jAV3@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e9c3af6-d16d-6d32-2f25-8cb92301e853@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1976 bytes --]

On Monday, 13 January 2020 08:34:01 GMT n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-01-13 09:22, Mick wrote:
> >>> Same result.  But I didn't delete "the whole portage tree".  What does
> >>> that mean?
> >>> 
> >>> rm -rf /var/db/repos?
> >> 
> >> If you're using the new default location, I think it is
> >> /var/db/repos/gentoo, but someone should confirm that.
> > 
> > Yes, the new location for the portage ebuilds is:
> > 
> > $ ls -la /var/db/repos/gentoo/.*
> 
> > /var/db/repos/gentoo/.:
> I just noticed that there's a new stag3, from 2020/01/12 instead of
> 2020/01/08 so - since this is a fresh install - I'm just going to start
> from there.

The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors.  A newer fs snapshot 
won't include the tree itself, but it will include the new default fs 
locations for the portage directory.


> > This bug points to the tree owned by root:root instead of portage:portage,
> > interestingly in my most recent installation the tree is owned by root as
> > you can see above and I'm not getting this problem.
> > 
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/661834
> 
> I'm not exactly sure what you mean here ... did you do a chown -R or
> will the ownership be different when my new stage3 is finally downloaded?

I do not recall running a chown on this installation.  Had I done this, in all 
likelihood I would have chown'ed it to portage:portage, as older installations 
of mine are set to.


> I'm not keen on overriding the default configuration in a global way 
> like changing the ownwhip of all files.

Right, I haven't changed them on this installation either and emerge FEATURES 
include

'... userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync'.

With 'userpriv' portage is meant to drop privileges to the owner of the gentoo 
repo directory, but if the directory is owned by root to start with I am not 
clear how userpriv is meant to work.  I take it your gentoo portage tree is 
also owned by root:root in its default installation state?

-- 
Regards,

Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-12 20:51 [gentoo-user] .tmp-unverified-download-quarantine n952162
2020-01-12 15:48 ` james
2020-01-13  8:24   ` n952162
2020-01-16 21:01     ` james
2020-01-18 13:50       ` Wols Lists
2020-01-18 17:45         ` n952162
2020-01-18 17:58           ` Wols Lists
2020-01-16 21:03     ` james
2020-01-12 22:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-12 22:41   ` n952162
2020-01-12 23:32     ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13  8:22       ` Mick
2020-01-13  8:34         ` n952162
2020-01-13  8:41           ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13 10:17           ` Mick [this message]
2020-01-13 10:42             ` n952162
2020-01-13 10:48               ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13 11:37                 ` n952162
2020-01-13 22:42                   ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-14  7:57                     ` n952162
2020-01-13 10:42             ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13 11:15               ` Mick
2020-01-13 22:40                 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13 23:16                   ` Mick
2020-01-14  8:04                     ` n952162
2020-01-14  8:44                       ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-14  9:37                         ` n952162
2020-01-14  9:47                           ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-14 10:10                           ` Peter Humphrey
2020-01-14 11:07                             ` n952162
2020-01-14 12:17                               ` Dale
2020-01-14 15:47                               ` Peter Humphrey
2020-01-14 18:36                                 ` Fw: " n952162
2020-01-15  9:17                                   ` Peter Humphrey
     [not found]                                     ` <48033839-c410-6e84-79ba-d5e061f4883a@web.de>
     [not found]                                       ` <3856247.qGUnUsoafO@peak>
2020-01-16 20:47                                         ` Fw: " n952162
2020-01-14 19:16                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-01-13  8:45         ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14357815.ppYdG0jAV3@localhost \
    --to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox