From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBD7138247 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC216E087E; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71781E0837 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.135] (helo=smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XbZSy-0002gP-PU for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:32 +0200 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XbZSy-0002ZX-5M for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:32 +0200 Received: from andromeda.localnet (unknown [10.20.13.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F28734B for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:26:24 +0200 (CEST) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1429500.u2QV0yu7Q5@andromeda> Organization: Antarean User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201410071620.34872.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> References: <20141007144833.GA1020@ca.inter.net> <201410071620.34872.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart1541419.cqTeUIExuD" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: d2977edb-d714-4fe7-9f1e-1821186b7a89 X-Archives-Hash: f8068ecfc9c61cb8cdbeb1249db17827 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --nextPart1541419.cqTeUIExuD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 04:20:16 PM Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote: > > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote: > > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, > > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium. > > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days > > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though > > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas) > > > > > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq > > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing? > > > > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently > > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed. > > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ; > > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox. > > My window manager is Fluxbox. > > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and > occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use > WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML. Why not use Dolphin as file manager? -- Joost --nextPart1541419.cqTeUIExuD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

 

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 04:20:16 PM Mick wrote:

> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:

> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:

> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,

> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.

> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days

> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though

> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)

> > >

> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq

> > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing?

> >

> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently

> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.

> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;

> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.

> > My window manager is Fluxbox.

>

> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and

> occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use

> WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML.

 

Why not use Dolphin as file manager?

 

--

Joost

--nextPart1541419.cqTeUIExuD--